Precision Redefined

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and international cross-sectional survey with Rasch psychometric analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, economic, and operational impact of navigation and robotics in spine surgery by integrating evidence from the best literature and real-world surgeon practice patterns. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Robotics and computer-assisted navigation (CAN) are increasingly adopted in spine surgery, with well-documented technical advantages in surgical accuracy and safety. However, their translation into improved patient outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and broad real-world applicability remains uncertain. METHODS: A scoping review and synthesis of published studies and meta-analyses was performed. In parallel, a 93-item international survey was distributed to spine surgeons across multiple countries, capturing perceptions of accuracy, radiation safety, costs, training, workflow, and patient outcomes. Responses (n = 195) were analyzed using Rasch modeling to assess consensus strength and item difficulty, supplemented by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Published data and meta-analyses confirm superior screw accuracy with robotics/CAN (≥95% safe-zone placement) and consistent reductions in staff radiation. Real-world surgeon survey responses showed high concordance on these technical benefits but persistent concerns regarding cost (37.4%), equipment availability (55.9%), workflow burden, and limited training access (8.2%). While 74.9% of surgeons anticipated global adoption as standard of care within 10 years, only 52.3% endorsed cost justification. Rasch analysis demonstrated strong consensus on accuracy and complication reduction but skepticism regarding economic viability. CONCLUSION: Navigation and robotics in spine surgery offer robust technical benefits but remain constrained by cost, training, and workflow barriers. Balanced integration-expanding applications beyond pedicle screw placement, supported by automation, standardized metrics, and scalable financial models-is essential to realize their full clinical and societal value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005710
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision Redefined

Benedikt W. Burkhardt, Morgan P. Lorio, Emmanouil Liodakis, A. Parajón et al.
Spine
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Precision Redefined

Benedikt W. Burkhardt, Morgan P. Lorio, Emmanouil Liodakis, A. Parajón, Oscar L. Alves, Paul Park, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski, Matthew Scott-Young, Alexander R. Vaccaro
article en

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and international cross-sectional survey with Rasch psychometric analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, economic, and operational impact of navigation and robotics in spine surgery by integrating evidence from the best literature and real-world surgeon practice patterns. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Robotics and computer-assisted navigation (CAN) are increasingly adopted in spine surgery, with well-documented technical advantages in surgical accuracy and safety. However, their translation into improved patient outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and broad real-world applicability remains uncertain. METHODS: A scoping review and synthesis of published studies and meta-analyses was performed. In parallel, a 93-item international survey was distributed to spine surgeons across multiple countries, capturing perceptions of accuracy, radiation safety, costs, training, workflow, and patient outcomes. Responses (n = 195) were analyzed using Rasch modeling to assess consensus strength and item difficulty, supplemented by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Published data and meta-analyses confirm superior screw accuracy with robotics/CAN (≥95% safe-zone placement) and consistent reductions in staff radiation. Real-world surgeon survey responses showed high concordance on these technical benefits but persistent concerns regarding cost (37.4%), equipment availability (55.9%), workflow burden, and limited training access (8.2%). While 74.9% of surgeons anticipated global adoption as standard of care within 10 years, only 52.3% endorsed cost justification. Rasch analysis demonstrated strong consensus on accuracy and complication reduction but skepticism regarding economic viability. CONCLUSION: Navigation and robotics in spine surgery offer robust technical benefits but remain constrained by cost, training, and workflow barriers. Balanced integration-expanding applications beyond pedicle screw placement, supported by automation, standardized metrics, and scalable financial models-is essential to realize their full clinical and societal value.

Spine
Bond University (AU), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Instituto de Neurociencias (ES), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (US), Klinik Hirslanden (CH), TAFE Queensland Gold Coast (AU), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Semmes Murphey Foundation (US), Desert Institute For Spine Care (US), Banner - University Medical Center Tucson (US), Rothman Institute (US), GastroZentrum Hirslanden Zürich (CH), Lusíada University of Porto (PT), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Fundación Universitaria Sanitas (CO), Saarland University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.