Precision Redefined
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and international cross-sectional survey with Rasch psychometric analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, economic, and operational impact of navigation and robotics in spine surgery by integrating evidence from the best literature and real-world surgeon practice patterns. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Robotics and computer-assisted navigation (CAN) are increasingly adopted in spine surgery, with well-documented technical advantages in surgical accuracy and safety. However, their translation into improved patient outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and broad real-world applicability remains uncertain. METHODS: A scoping review and synthesis of published studies and meta-analyses was performed. In parallel, a 93-item international survey was distributed to spine surgeons across multiple countries, capturing perceptions of accuracy, radiation safety, costs, training, workflow, and patient outcomes. Responses (n = 195) were analyzed using Rasch modeling to assess consensus strength and item difficulty, supplemented by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Published data and meta-analyses confirm superior screw accuracy with robotics/CAN (≥95% safe-zone placement) and consistent reductions in staff radiation. Real-world surgeon survey responses showed high concordance on these technical benefits but persistent concerns regarding cost (37.4%), equipment availability (55.9%), workflow burden, and limited training access (8.2%). While 74.9% of surgeons anticipated global adoption as standard of care within 10 years, only 52.3% endorsed cost justification. Rasch analysis demonstrated strong consensus on accuracy and complication reduction but skepticism regarding economic viability. CONCLUSION: Navigation and robotics in spine surgery offer robust technical benefits but remain constrained by cost, training, and workflow barriers. Balanced integration-expanding applications beyond pedicle screw placement, supported by automation, standardized metrics, and scalable financial models-is essential to realize their full clinical and societal value.
Authors
- Benedikt W. Burkhardt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9460-9807)
- Morgan P. Lorio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-2095)
- Emmanouil Liodakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-6216)
- A. Parajón
- Oscar L. Alves
- Paul Park
- Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Matthew Scott-Young
- Alexander R. Vaccaro
Institutions
- Bond University (AU)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- Instituto de Neurociencias (ES)
- American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (US)
- Klinik Hirslanden (CH)
- TAFE Queensland Gold Coast (AU)
- Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT)
- Semmes Murphey Foundation (US)
- Desert Institute For Spine Care (US)
- Banner - University Medical Center Tucson (US)
- Rothman Institute (US)
- GastroZentrum Hirslanden Zürich (CH)
- Lusíada University of Porto (PT)
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
- Fundación Universitaria Sanitas (CO)
- Saarland University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Spine
- Published
- 2026-04-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005710
- Primary Topic
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00