Humour and hazard

This study explores how Turkish cartoonists, as critical social commentators, perceive occupational incidents and utilise visual satire to shape public discourse on workplace safety. Based on a survey of 33 cartoonists, the research examines their views on the failures of institutional oversight, the effectiveness of media coverage, and the potential of cartoons as a powerful medium for social change. The findings reveal a dominant perception among cartoonists that OHS (Occupational Health and Safety) is not sufficiently prioritised by Turkish authorities, and that legal regulations and audits are perceived as inadequate. A significant portion of the respondents had either experienced or witnessed workplace accidents, informing their critical stance and artistic focus. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship between cartoonists’ political views and their perceptions of institutional performance in OHS, underlining the political dimensions of their critique. Most cartoonists believe cartoons have strong potential to influence public perception and contribute to societal awareness. Cartoons are often inspired by real incidents reported in the media and target various stakeholders, including government, employers, and society. Industries like mining, construction, and shipbuilding were frequently addressed due to their high-risk nature. This study contributes to understanding how visual satire can act as a medium for social change. It emphasises the role of cartoonists as informal communicators and educators in advancing occupational safety, offering practical insights for policymakers, media professionals, and educators aiming to enhance safety culture through creative media.