Dissociating executive prefrontal substrates following capsulotomy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by widespread executive function impairments linked to disrupted fronto-striatal circuits. Ablative therapies such as capsulotomy show promise efficacy in treatment-refractory OCD, yet their effects on executive neural substrates remain poorly understood. This study explores how OCD and capsulotomy influence executive prefrontal function. Twenty-three post-capsulotomy OCD patients, thirty OCD controls, and thirty-two health controls (HC) were recruited in the study. Post-capsulotomy patients were recruited at least 6 months following surgery to allow for post-operative stabilization. Participants completed three executive function tasks assessing distinct cognitive domains: the Extra-Dimensional Intra-Dimensional (EDID) task testing set-shifting, the N-back task testing working memory and flanker task measuring conflict processing. The EDID and N-back tasks were administered during concurrent task-based fMRI, while the flanker task provided only behavioral measures. In the EDID task, OCD capsulotomy patients demonstrated greater post-error flexibility towards ID versus ED shifting relative to both OCD controls and healthy controls, despite exhibiting more ED errors. OCD controls showed less shifts after errors compared to HC, which was not revealed in the capsulotomy group. OCD patients showed less neural differentiation between ED versus ID in lateral and mesial prefrontal regions relative to HC. Capsulotomy was associated with decreased pre-supplementary motor area activity to ED shifts compared to HC, indicating impairments in neural reactivity to ED shifting. No evidence supported the influence of capsulotomy in the n-back or the flanker task. Specifically, both OCD groups showed impaired working memory performance at high memory load along with dysfunction in the whole frontoparietal network. In the flanker task, impairment in dissociating congruent and incongruent conditions were found in both OCD groups but not in the HC group. These findings suggest capsulotomy specifically remediates error-monitoring and behavioral flexibility through mesial prefrontal remodeling, while leaving working memory and conflict processing deficits intact. This dissociation implies that cognitive flexibility may represent a state-dependent process amenable to intervention, whereas working memory and conflict processing impairments may reflect trait markers of OCD vulnerability. These results have clinical implications on relative safety profile of capsulotomy and patient selection for precision neuromodulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.129555
Primary Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissociating executive prefrontal substrates following capsulotomy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Yingying Zhang, Jiechun Zhang, Luis Manssuer, Yijie Zhao et al.
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
article

Dissociating executive prefrontal substrates following capsulotomy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Yingying Zhang, Jiechun Zhang, Luis Manssuer, Yijie Zhao, Hailun Cui, Wenjuan Liu, Valerie Voon, Haibin Li, Ruiqin Chen, Bomin Sun
article en

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by widespread executive function impairments linked to disrupted fronto-striatal circuits. Ablative therapies such as capsulotomy show promise efficacy in treatment-refractory OCD, yet their effects on executive neural substrates remain poorly understood. This study explores how OCD and capsulotomy influence executive prefrontal function. Twenty-three post-capsulotomy OCD patients, thirty OCD controls, and thirty-two health controls (HC) were recruited in the study. Post-capsulotomy patients were recruited at least 6 months following surgery to allow for post-operative stabilization. Participants completed three executive function tasks assessing distinct cognitive domains: the Extra-Dimensional Intra-Dimensional (EDID) task testing set-shifting, the N-back task testing working memory and flanker task measuring conflict processing. The EDID and N-back tasks were administered during concurrent task-based fMRI, while the flanker task provided only behavioral measures. In the EDID task, OCD capsulotomy patients demonstrated greater post-error flexibility towards ID versus ED shifting relative to both OCD controls and healthy controls, despite exhibiting more ED errors. OCD controls showed less shifts after errors compared to HC, which was not revealed in the capsulotomy group. OCD patients showed less neural differentiation between ED versus ID in lateral and mesial prefrontal regions relative to HC. Capsulotomy was associated with decreased pre-supplementary motor area activity to ED shifts compared to HC, indicating impairments in neural reactivity to ED shifting. No evidence supported the influence of capsulotomy in the n-back or the flanker task. Specifically, both OCD groups showed impaired working memory performance at high memory load along with dysfunction in the whole frontoparietal network. In the flanker task, impairment in dissociating congruent and incongruent conditions were found in both OCD groups but not in the HC group. These findings suggest capsulotomy specifically remediates error-monitoring and behavioral flexibility through mesial prefrontal remodeling, while leaving working memory and conflict processing deficits intact. This dissociation implies that cognitive flexibility may represent a state-dependent process amenable to intervention, whereas working memory and conflict processing impairments may reflect trait markers of OCD vulnerability. These results have clinical implications on relative safety profile of capsulotomy and patient selection for precision neuromodulation.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tongji University, Shanghai Pudong New Area Health Commission, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.