Safety Evaluation of Articaine and Lignocaine as Local Anesthetic Agents in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aims and background: Articaine is known to be safe in children; however, it is not suggested for children under the age of four.Various studies have been performed that show articaine as a superior local anesthetic (LA) agent when compared with lignocaine.This study aimed to systematically review the safety of lignocaine and articaine as LA agents in pediatric dental patients.Method: An electronic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on adverse reactions of lignocaine and articaine in children between 4 and 13 years of age was conducted.The databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, CBM, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI.A thorough electronic search was conducted for studies published up to May 2024.Seven articles were included in the systematic review.For each of the included studies, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) were assessed.Relative risk (RR) and standard deviations were used to summarize the data from each of the studies, and meta-analyses were conducted with studies of limited heterogeneity.Results: Based on the available evidence, lignocaine and articaine appear to have similar safety profiles when used as LA agents in pediatric dental patients.Meta-analysis showed a nonsignificant statistical difference in favor of soft tissue injury [RR = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.17, 1.28), p = 0.14], postoperative pain (RR = 1.68, 95% CI (0.56, 5.08), p = 0.36), and edema (RR = 1.78, 95% CI (0.17, 18.81), p = 0.63).Overall adverse events were also nonsignificant (RR = 1.26, 95% CI (0.62, 2.54), p = 0.52).Conclusion: Buccal infiltration with 4% articaine was equally safe as inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% lignocaine for primary tooth extraction and endodontic procedures.More clinical trials should be conducted that measure the effects of lignocaine and articaine on blood pressure, pulse rate, and tissue rehabilitation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3513
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety Evaluation of Articaine and Lignocaine as Local Anesthetic Agents in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nilima Ramdas Thosar, Prasanna T Dahake, Purva B Babhulgaonkar, Yogesh J Kale et al.
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
article

Safety Evaluation of Articaine and Lignocaine as Local Anesthetic Agents in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nilima Ramdas Thosar, Prasanna T Dahake, Purva B Babhulgaonkar, Yogesh J Kale, Mahesh V Dadpe, Shrikant B Kendre
article en

Abstract

Aims and background: Articaine is known to be safe in children; however, it is not suggested for children under the age of four.Various studies have been performed that show articaine as a superior local anesthetic (LA) agent when compared with lignocaine.This study aimed to systematically review the safety of lignocaine and articaine as LA agents in pediatric dental patients.Method: An electronic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on adverse reactions of lignocaine and articaine in children between 4 and 13 years of age was conducted.The databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, CBM, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI.A thorough electronic search was conducted for studies published up to May 2024.Seven articles were included in the systematic review.For each of the included studies, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) were assessed.Relative risk (RR) and standard deviations were used to summarize the data from each of the studies, and meta-analyses were conducted with studies of limited heterogeneity.Results: Based on the available evidence, lignocaine and articaine appear to have similar safety profiles when used as LA agents in pediatric dental patients.Meta-analysis showed a nonsignificant statistical difference in favor of soft tissue injury [RR = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.17, 1.28), p = 0.14], postoperative pain (RR = 1.68, 95% CI (0.56, 5.08), p = 0.36), and edema (RR = 1.78, 95% CI (0.17, 18.81), p = 0.63).Overall adverse events were also nonsignificant (RR = 1.26, 95% CI (0.62, 2.54), p = 0.52).Conclusion: Buccal infiltration with 4% articaine was equally safe as inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% lignocaine for primary tooth extraction and endodontic procedures.More clinical trials should be conducted that measure the effects of lignocaine and articaine on blood pressure, pulse rate, and tissue rehabilitation.

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric DentistryVol. 19(5)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety Evaluation of Articaine and Lignocaine as Local Anesthetic Agents in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — Nilima Ramdas Thosar, Prasanna T Dahake, et al. · International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS