A mixed-methods first-year evaluation of implementation outcomes for a bottom-up osteoarthritis management program across healthcare settings in Ireland

Background: The Good Life with osteoArthritis Denmark (GLA:D®) non-profit initiative is a bottom-up approach to deliver evidence-based care, including exercise and education, to people with hip or knee osteoarthritis. GLA:D® was adapted for public and private healthcare in Ireland, using a participatory approach to co-design implementation strategies that would ensure optimal and equitable access. Purpose: To evaluate implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration and sustainability of GLA:D® Ireland across healthcare settings, in the first year. Methods: Mixed methods explanatory sequential design. GLA:D® training was advertised to physiotherapists in different healthcare settings around Ireland. Quantitative implementation outcomes were collected from the GLA:D® Ireland Registry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with trained physiotherapists and participants and analyzed to identify themes. Results: In the first year, 32% of the 71 physiotherapists trained implemented GLA:D® in practice (n = 10 primary care, n = 2 public hospital, n = 3 private). Of 146 participants, 41% were from three sites with ≥1 physiotherapist trained. In interviews (10 physiotherapists, 9 participants), satisfaction with the structured nature that allowed individualization and self-management was reported. Physiotherapists used the program to tackle long waitlists and participants regained confidence to exercise. While equipment costs were low, more staffing and space were mediators for feasibility and sustainability across settings. Conclusions: While a high proportion of GLA:D® adopters were in primary care settings, penetration was more successful in public hospitals, with more resources and physiotherapists trained per site. Results suggest that implementation strategies could be adapted to incentivize training of multiple staff at one site and training of support staff. Top-down funding would help to ensure timely and equitable access to the program across healthcare settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/19374
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mixed-methods first-year evaluation of implementation outcomes for a bottom-up osteoarthritis management program across healthcare settings in Ireland

Avantika Bhardwaj, Norelee Kennedy, Anne MacFarlane, Steering Committee IMPACT et al.
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

A mixed-methods first-year evaluation of implementation outcomes for a bottom-up osteoarthritis management program across healthcare settings in Ireland

Avantika Bhardwaj, Norelee Kennedy, Anne MacFarlane, Steering Committee IMPACT, Clodagh M. Toomey
article en

Abstract

Background: The Good Life with osteoArthritis Denmark (GLA:D®) non-profit initiative is a bottom-up approach to deliver evidence-based care, including exercise and education, to people with hip or knee osteoarthritis. GLA:D® was adapted for public and private healthcare in Ireland, using a participatory approach to co-design implementation strategies that would ensure optimal and equitable access. Purpose: To evaluate implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration and sustainability of GLA:D® Ireland across healthcare settings, in the first year. Methods: Mixed methods explanatory sequential design. GLA:D® training was advertised to physiotherapists in different healthcare settings around Ireland. Quantitative implementation outcomes were collected from the GLA:D® Ireland Registry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with trained physiotherapists and participants and analyzed to identify themes. Results: In the first year, 32% of the 71 physiotherapists trained implemented GLA:D® in practice (n = 10 primary care, n = 2 public hospital, n = 3 private). Of 146 participants, 41% were from three sites with ≥1 physiotherapist trained. In interviews (10 physiotherapists, 9 participants), satisfaction with the structured nature that allowed individualization and self-management was reported. Physiotherapists used the program to tackle long waitlists and participants regained confidence to exercise. While equipment costs were low, more staffing and space were mediators for feasibility and sustainability across settings. Conclusions: While a high proportion of GLA:D® adopters were in primary care settings, penetration was more successful in public hospitals, with more resources and physiotherapists trained per site. Results suggest that implementation strategies could be adapted to incentivize training of multiple staff at one site and training of support staff. Top-down funding would help to ensure timely and equitable access to the program across healthcare settings.

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.