Exploring Research Capacity Among Advanced Practice Nurses in Healthcare: A Rapid Review

AIMS: Research and innovation are essential for advancing clinical practice and safeguarding patient safety in healthcare. This review aims to assess the research capacity of Advanced Practice Nurses in Australian healthcare settings. By identifying the barriers and enablers to, the findings aim to inspire research engagement of paediatric nurses. DESIGN: A rapid review methodology was used to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise data relevant to Advanced Practice Nurses' research capacity. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of Ovid Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was conducted, covering publications from 1 July 2010 to May 2024. Additional reference checks and grey literature searches were undertaken to identify relevant studies. REVIEW METHODS: Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently and checked by the research team. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment and a descriptive narrative synthesis approach integrated findings across qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed that while Advanced Practice Nurses value research and evidence-based practice, barriers-such as time constraints, limited resources, and lack of organisational support-restricted their engagement. Leadership support and structured mentorship were identified as critical enablers of research capacity. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need for targeted strategies to enhance Advanced Practice Nurses' research capacity within Australian healthcare. Addressing identified barriers and fostering a supportive environment can empower Advanced Practice Nurses to better utilise their roles, contributing to improved patient care and healthcare innovation. IMPACT: This research addresses the limited understanding of research capacity among Advanced Practice Nurses identifying challenges and opportunities for engagement. It is particularly relevant for healthcare organisations, policymakers, and educational institutions seeking to strengthen research capacity among APN roles. Findings will inform evidence-based practice, patient outcomes, and research culture in Australian healthcare services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42024539163.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70301
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Research Capacity Among Advanced Practice Nurses in Healthcare: A Rapid Review

Fiona Gotterson, Laurel Mimmo, Marilyn Cruickshank, Alana McDonald et al.
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Exploring Research Capacity Among Advanced Practice Nurses in Healthcare: A Rapid Review

Fiona Gotterson, Laurel Mimmo, Marilyn Cruickshank, Alana McDonald, Sandra Charlton
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Research and innovation are essential for advancing clinical practice and safeguarding patient safety in healthcare. This review aims to assess the research capacity of Advanced Practice Nurses in Australian healthcare settings. By identifying the barriers and enablers to, the findings aim to inspire research engagement of paediatric nurses. DESIGN: A rapid review methodology was used to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise data relevant to Advanced Practice Nurses' research capacity. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of Ovid Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was conducted, covering publications from 1 July 2010 to May 2024. Additional reference checks and grey literature searches were undertaken to identify relevant studies. REVIEW METHODS: Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently and checked by the research team. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment and a descriptive narrative synthesis approach integrated findings across qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed that while Advanced Practice Nurses value research and evidence-based practice, barriers-such as time constraints, limited resources, and lack of organisational support-restricted their engagement. Leadership support and structured mentorship were identified as critical enablers of research capacity. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need for targeted strategies to enhance Advanced Practice Nurses' research capacity within Australian healthcare. Addressing identified barriers and fostering a supportive environment can empower Advanced Practice Nurses to better utilise their roles, contributing to improved patient care and healthcare innovation. IMPACT: This research addresses the limited understanding of research capacity among Advanced Practice Nurses identifying challenges and opportunities for engagement. It is particularly relevant for healthcare organisations, policymakers, and educational institutions seeking to strengthen research capacity among APN roles. Findings will inform evidence-based practice, patient outcomes, and research culture in Australian healthcare services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42024539163.

Journal of Clinical Nursing
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
NSW Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.