Evaluation of a numerical simulation for multibipolar radiofrequency ablation
INTRODUCTION: porcine liver model. A GPU-accelerated finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation coupling the quasi-static Maxwell and Pennes' bioheat equations was implemented to model mbRFA. METHODS: mbRFA were performed using three internally cooled bipolar applicators. A saline-perfused glass tube was employed to simulate a standardized blood flow and positioned at five predefined distances from the ablation center in 2.5 mm increments. Simulated and experimental ablations were compared using area-, surface- and classification-based metrics on a standardized two-dimensional (2D) cross section to evaluate the model's predictive accuracy. RESULTS: ablations and the simulation were 0.92 (Dice coefficient) and 0.85 (Jaccard coefficient), respectively. Compared to the reference area, the simulation overestimated the ablation zone by 4% (false-positive regions) and underestimated it by 10% (false-negative regions). CONCLUSION: Overall, the numerical model demonstrated good spatial agreement with the experimental ablations, confirming its suitability for quantitative prediction of ablation geometry.
Authors
- Hanne Ballhausen
- Kai S. Lehmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-3821)
- David Sinden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8514-8279)
- Christian Rieder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-2666)
- Ole Gemeinhardt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-865X)
- Franz Poch
- Christina A. Neizert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2634-3602)
- Tobias Preußer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4339-8675)
Institutions
- University of Bremen (DE)
- University Hospital Augsburg (DE)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Hasomed (Germany) (DE)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Hyperthermia
- Published
- 2026-04-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2026.2657470
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00