Soybean plant population density recommendations across the United States

Abstract Rising production costs and declining commodity prices have compelled farmers to reassess their input and management strategies. Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr] seed costs, in particular, have continued to increase due to advances in biotechnology, higher‐yielding germplasm, and available seed treatments, accounting for 32–35% of the total operational expenses in current soybean production systems. Optimizing seeding rate is therefore one area of consideration for improving profitability and maximizing return on investment. However, soybean yield response to plant population density is influenced by the combination of several factors, including water availability, temperature, radiation interception, planting practices, and crop growth and development. Unlike many other crops, soybean exhibits high phenotypic plasticity, allowing plants to adjust their growth and yield components (e.g., number of pods and seeds per plant) in response to varying plant population densities. As a result, the literature has shown that soybean can produce comparable yields across a wide range of plant population densities. The objectives of this management guide were to (i) provide an overview of factors influencing soybean yield response to seeding rate and plant population density and (ii) summarize recommendations by land grant university Extension agronomists across soybean‐producing states in the United States.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70118
Primary Topic
Soybean genetics and cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soybean plant population density recommendations across the United States

André Fróes de Borja Reis, Mark A. Licht, Haleigh J. Ortmeier‐Clarke, Michael J. Mulvaney et al.
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Soybean genetics and cultivation
article

Soybean plant population density recommendations across the United States

André Fróes de Borja Reis, Mark A. Licht, Haleigh J. Ortmeier‐Clarke, Michael J. Mulvaney, Seth L. Naeve, Shaun N. Casteel, Giovani Preza Fontes, Emma G. Matcham, Laura E. Lindsey, Michael T. Plumblee, Chad D. Lee, Eros Artur Bohac Francisco, David Moseley, Daniela R. Carrijo, Carrie C. Ortel, Rachel Vann, Jeremy Ross, Emerson D. Nafziger, Nicolás Cafaro La Menza, Maninder P. Singh, Shawn Conley, Jake McNeal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rising production costs and declining commodity prices have compelled farmers to reassess their input and management strategies. Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr] seed costs, in particular, have continued to increase due to advances in biotechnology, higher‐yielding germplasm, and available seed treatments, accounting for 32–35% of the total operational expenses in current soybean production systems. Optimizing seeding rate is therefore one area of consideration for improving profitability and maximizing return on investment. However, soybean yield response to plant population density is influenced by the combination of several factors, including water availability, temperature, radiation interception, planting practices, and crop growth and development. Unlike many other crops, soybean exhibits high phenotypic plasticity, allowing plants to adjust their growth and yield components (e.g., number of pods and seeds per plant) in response to varying plant population densities. As a result, the literature has shown that soybean can produce comparable yields across a wide range of plant population densities. The objectives of this management guide were to (i) provide an overview of factors influencing soybean yield response to seeding rate and plant population density and (ii) summarize recommendations by land grant university Extension agronomists across soybean‐producing states in the United States.

Crop Forage & Turfgrass ManagementVol. 12(1)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Minnesota (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Iowa State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Missouri College (US), University of Arkansas System (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), University of Missouri (US), Clemson University (US), Auburn University (US), Virginia Tech (US), Michigan State University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
United Soybean Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soybean genetics and cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.