Muscle Mass Is a Better Predictor of Survival in Dogs With Chronic Kidney Disease Compared to Body Condition Score

Monitoring prognostic factors, such as body weight, is important to assess the effectiveness of therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimate the survival rate (SR). As established in the literature, both body condition score (BCS) and muscle mass score (MMS), when analysed individually, show a positive correlation with SR in dogs with CKD. However, no studies have analysed the correlation between both parameters on SR. The present study aimed to clarify the real influence of fat and lean mass on the SR in dogs with CKD, based on a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, to improve the nutritional management of these patients. This study included 120 client-owned adult dogs diagnosed with CKD stages 2, 3, or 4. The hazard ratios for stage, BCS, MMS, age, and sex were estimated in univariate and multivariable analyses. The results showed survival was not influenced by BCS alone but was influenced by MMS. Severe muscle mass loss (MMS 0) had a 3.85-fold risk of mortality when compared to normal muscle mass (p = 0.006). Regardless of body condition, the present study observed that what really influenced the survival of dogs with CKD, considering the stage, was muscle mass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.70061
Primary Topic
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muscle Mass Is a Better Predictor of Survival in Dogs With Chronic Kidney Disease Compared to Body Condition Score

Vivian Pedrinelli, Natália Manuela Cardoso de Oliveira, Andressa Rodrigues Amaral, Bianca Petermann Moretti et al.
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
article

Muscle Mass Is a Better Predictor of Survival in Dogs With Chronic Kidney Disease Compared to Body Condition Score

Vivian Pedrinelli, Natália Manuela Cardoso de Oliveira, Andressa Rodrigues Amaral, Bianca Petermann Moretti, Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini, Pedro Henrique Marchi, Márcio Antônio Brunetto, Laís Oyama Cotrim Lima, Cristiana F. F. Pontieri, Juliana T. Jeremias, Júlio Cesar de Carvalho Balieiro
article en

Abstract

Monitoring prognostic factors, such as body weight, is important to assess the effectiveness of therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimate the survival rate (SR). As established in the literature, both body condition score (BCS) and muscle mass score (MMS), when analysed individually, show a positive correlation with SR in dogs with CKD. However, no studies have analysed the correlation between both parameters on SR. The present study aimed to clarify the real influence of fat and lean mass on the SR in dogs with CKD, based on a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, to improve the nutritional management of these patients. This study included 120 client-owned adult dogs diagnosed with CKD stages 2, 3, or 4. The hazard ratios for stage, BCS, MMS, age, and sex were estimated in univariate and multivariable analyses. The results showed survival was not influenced by BCS alone but was influenced by MMS. Severe muscle mass loss (MMS 0) had a 3.85-fold risk of mortality when compared to normal muscle mass (p = 0.006). Regardless of body condition, the present study observed that what really influenced the survival of dogs with CKD, considering the stage, was muscle mass.

Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital (US), Suma Indústria e Comércio (Brasil) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.