Analysis and Comparison of CO2 Emission Mitigation Measures by the Cement Industry in Ibero-American Countries

Abstract According to Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), the cement industry is responsible for about 7–8% of all anthropogenic CO 2 emissions released into the atmosphere as reported by GCCA et al. (CCUS in the Indian Cement Industry: A Review of CO 2 Hubs and Storage Facilities, 2024). Clinker production results in high energy costs and the release of CO 2 due to the calcination or decarbonation of its main raw material, limestone. In addition, energy is consumed to heat and maintain the temperature inside the rotary kiln, involving another significant CO 2 release. This work presents a review of mitigation processes in seven Ibero-American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Portugal and Spain) that guide the cement industry toward carbon-neutral production by 2030 and 2050. The mitigation parameters are analysed based on the global roadmap published by GCCA (Global Cement and Concrete Association), FICEM (Inter-American Cement Federation) and CEMBUREAU (European Cement Association), as well as the national roadmaps. The six main parameters identified across the countries’ roadmaps were the reduction of total direct CO 2 emissions in cement production, thermal efficiency, electrical efficiency, the clinker factor, the use of alternative fuels and (re)carbonation. The adoption of biomass as an alternative fuel and the reduction of the clinker factor through the use of SCM were identified as the main strategies for lowering CO 2 emissions from Portland cement production in all seven countries analysed. Despite current efforts, CO 2 mitigation in the cement industry has limits. Achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 will require substantial investment in CO 2 capture, storage and utilization technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-026-00901-9
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis and Comparison of CO2 Emission Mitigation Measures by the Cement Industry in Ibero-American Countries

Jéssica Fall Nogueira Chaves, Moisés Frı́as, Lucas de Paula Vasques, Edgardo F. Irassar et al.
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

Analysis and Comparison of CO2 Emission Mitigation Measures by the Cement Industry in Ibero-American Countries

Jéssica Fall Nogueira Chaves, Moisés Frı́as, Lucas de Paula Vasques, Edgardo F. Irassar, Jorge de Brito, Miguel Ángel Sanjuán, Jorge I. Tobón, João Henrique da Silva Rêgo, Elena Flores, Holmer Savastano, Jaime Carlos Gálvez Ruiz, Viviana Letelier Gonzalez, João Nuno Noronha Ramos Vigário Pacheco
article en

Abstract

Abstract According to Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), the cement industry is responsible for about 7–8% of all anthropogenic CO 2 emissions released into the atmosphere as reported by GCCA et al. (CCUS in the Indian Cement Industry: A Review of CO 2 Hubs and Storage Facilities, 2024). Clinker production results in high energy costs and the release of CO 2 due to the calcination or decarbonation of its main raw material, limestone. In addition, energy is consumed to heat and maintain the temperature inside the rotary kiln, involving another significant CO 2 release. This work presents a review of mitigation processes in seven Ibero-American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Portugal and Spain) that guide the cement industry toward carbon-neutral production by 2030 and 2050. The mitigation parameters are analysed based on the global roadmap published by GCCA (Global Cement and Concrete Association), FICEM (Inter-American Cement Federation) and CEMBUREAU (European Cement Association), as well as the national roadmaps. The six main parameters identified across the countries’ roadmaps were the reduction of total direct CO 2 emissions in cement production, thermal efficiency, electrical efficiency, the clinker factor, the use of alternative fuels and (re)carbonation. The adoption of biomass as an alternative fuel and the reduction of the clinker factor through the use of SCM were identified as the main strategies for lowering CO 2 emissions from Portland cement production in all seven countries analysed. Despite current efforts, CO 2 mitigation in the cement industry has limits. Achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 will require substantial investment in CO 2 capture, storage and utilization technologies.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and MaterialsVol. 20(1)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), National University of the West (AR), Spanish Clinical Research Network (ES), Instituto de Ciencias de La Construcción Eduardo Torroja (ES), Paralab (Portugal) (PT), Universidad de Ingeniería y Tecnología (PE), National University of the Arts (AR), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Universidade de Brasília, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal, CYTED Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.