Structural Intelligence as a Cross-Domain Operating Pattern: Field, Viability, Burden, Evolution, and Reorganization Across Psyche, Institutions, AI, Physics, and Biology

This paper presents Structural Intelligence as a cross-domain operating pattern rather than a closed doctrine or final ontology. Its central claim is that a recurrent structural sequence appears across very different domains strongly enough to support a portable read: a form becomes viable in a field, carries burden, stabilizes through coherence or regulation, begins to drift when contact weakens, defends itself by narrowing revision, and reorganizes only when answerability returns strongly enough to alter the holder itself. The paper argues that biology and evolution provide the strongest bridge for showing that this pattern tracks something real rather than functioning only as metaphor. Organisms are bounded local holders under continuous burden. They must regulate exchange, maintain viability, absorb stress, and either repair, reorganize, or fail. Evolution extends this logic across time through selection, adaptation, ecological modification, scaffolded holding, and higher-order integration. The paper draws especially on niche construction, ecological scaffolding, and major transitions in individuality to show that field-conditioned viability, burden-bearing organization, changed selection conditions, and reorganization are not merely suggestive analogies but real features of living systems. It then uses the same operating pattern to clarify psyche, institutions, AI, and bounded physical regimes while remaining disciplined about non-reduction. The result is a portable way of reading structural status: what field made a form viable, what burden it carries, how coherence stabilizes it, what contact still reaches it, what cost is hidden or exported, and whether reality can still revise it before failure hardens.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19707792
Primary Topic
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Intelligence as a Cross-Domain Operating Pattern: Field, Viability, Burden, Evolution, and Reorganization Across Psyche, Institutions, AI, Physics, and Biology

Vladisav Jovanovic
Open MIND
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
article

Structural Intelligence as a Cross-Domain Operating Pattern: Field, Viability, Burden, Evolution, and Reorganization Across Psyche, Institutions, AI, Physics, and Biology

Vladisav Jovanovic
article en

Abstract

This paper presents Structural Intelligence as a cross-domain operating pattern rather than a closed doctrine or final ontology. Its central claim is that a recurrent structural sequence appears across very different domains strongly enough to support a portable read: a form becomes viable in a field, carries burden, stabilizes through coherence or regulation, begins to drift when contact weakens, defends itself by narrowing revision, and reorganizes only when answerability returns strongly enough to alter the holder itself. The paper argues that biology and evolution provide the strongest bridge for showing that this pattern tracks something real rather than functioning only as metaphor. Organisms are bounded local holders under continuous burden. They must regulate exchange, maintain viability, absorb stress, and either repair, reorganize, or fail. Evolution extends this logic across time through selection, adaptation, ecological modification, scaffolded holding, and higher-order integration. The paper draws especially on niche construction, ecological scaffolding, and major transitions in individuality to show that field-conditioned viability, burden-bearing organization, changed selection conditions, and reorganization are not merely suggestive analogies but real features of living systems. It then uses the same operating pattern to clarify psyche, institutions, AI, and bounded physical regimes while remaining disciplined about non-reduction. The result is a portable way of reading structural status: what field made a form viable, what burden it carries, how coherence stabilizes it, what contact still reaches it, what cost is hidden or exported, and whether reality can still revise it before failure hardens.

Open MIND
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.