Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Rapid and valid cognitive screening tools are a mainstay of clinical practice in the assessment of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Although there are several available tools, there is concern for reduced sensitivity over time. This study evaluates the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination (DICE) to establish concurrent validity with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and to establish the clinical utility of the DICE in differentiating clinical groups.
Authors
- Carolina E. Quiroga del Rio
- Kim G. Johnson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-2489)
- Deborah K. Attix (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-9902)
- Thomas J. Farrer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8092-6214)
- Michael William Lutz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-5574)
- Paula-Ann E. Chin
- Richard O’Brien (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-158X)
- Christine Park
- Jill Z. Stuart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1190-633X)
Institutions
- University of Idaho (US)
- Duke University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neurology Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2026-04-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1212/cpj.0000000000200617
- Primary Topic
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00