Antibiotic-loaded pMMA nanofiber mats as antibacterial material: Comparative analysis of levofloxacin and chloramphenicol release

In this work, we fabricated polymer mats consisting of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) nanofibers loaded with antibiotic levofloxacin (LV) or chloramphenicol (CAM) and characterized them using microscopic method, UV-visible absorption spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. The diameter of the obtained nanofibers ranged from 1 to 4 μm. We analyzed the kinetics of the drug release from the mats and studied their antibacterial properties. The antibiotics release from the nanofiber mat when soaked in an aqueous solution was studied using UV-Vis spectroscopy. LDI mass spectrometry probing of saline extracts from the mats loaded by LV or CAM demonstrated the presence of abundant peaks of molecular ions of both antibiotics in the spectra. Such result confirms the preservation of the molecular structure of most LV molecules, as well as CAM molecules during the processes of antibacterial mat fabrication and drugs extraction from the mats, which is important for keeping their antibacterial properties. UV-Vis spectroscopy observations showed that ≈50% of LV was released into the aqueous solution within the first 10 min, and the remaining 20% within the next 3 h. In contrast, the release time of CAM was significantly longer: only 10% of the CAM was released from the mat within the first 5 h, and the next 5% required 45 h. The overall release fraction was only 35%, which took about 650 h. It is supposed that LV exhibits a faster and more intense release due to its hydrophilicity and weaker binding to PMMA, while CAM demonstrates a slower and more incomplete release due to its lower water solubility and stronger binding with the hydrophobic PMMA matrix. The antibacterial properties of the antibiotic-loaded nanofiber matrix were studied against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The study revealed that both types of mats demonstrated high efficacy against these bacteria, with the exception of CAM, which showed lower activity against P. aeruginosa 9027.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Low Temperature Physics
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0043378
Primary Topic
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antibiotic-loaded pMMA nanofiber mats as antibacterial material: Comparative analysis of levofloxacin and chloramphenicol release

P. O. Kuzema, V. A. Karachevtsev, А. М. Плохотниченко, V. A. Pashynska et al.
Low Temperature Physics
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
article

Antibiotic-loaded pMMA nanofiber mats as antibacterial material: Comparative analysis of levofloxacin and chloramphenicol release

P. O. Kuzema, V. A. Karachevtsev, А. М. Плохотниченко, V. A. Pashynska, O.V. Trufanov
article en

Abstract

In this work, we fabricated polymer mats consisting of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) nanofibers loaded with antibiotic levofloxacin (LV) or chloramphenicol (CAM) and characterized them using microscopic method, UV-visible absorption spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. The diameter of the obtained nanofibers ranged from 1 to 4 μm. We analyzed the kinetics of the drug release from the mats and studied their antibacterial properties. The antibiotics release from the nanofiber mat when soaked in an aqueous solution was studied using UV-Vis spectroscopy. LDI mass spectrometry probing of saline extracts from the mats loaded by LV or CAM demonstrated the presence of abundant peaks of molecular ions of both antibiotics in the spectra. Such result confirms the preservation of the molecular structure of most LV molecules, as well as CAM molecules during the processes of antibacterial mat fabrication and drugs extraction from the mats, which is important for keeping their antibacterial properties. UV-Vis spectroscopy observations showed that ≈50% of LV was released into the aqueous solution within the first 10 min, and the remaining 20% within the next 3 h. In contrast, the release time of CAM was significantly longer: only 10% of the CAM was released from the mat within the first 5 h, and the next 5% required 45 h. The overall release fraction was only 35%, which took about 650 h. It is supposed that LV exhibits a faster and more intense release due to its hydrophilicity and weaker binding to PMMA, while CAM demonstrates a slower and more incomplete release due to its lower water solubility and stronger binding with the hydrophobic PMMA matrix. The antibacterial properties of the antibiotic-loaded nanofiber matrix were studied against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The study revealed that both types of mats demonstrated high efficacy against these bacteria, with the exception of CAM, which showed lower activity against P. aeruginosa 9027.

Low Temperature PhysicsVol. 52(5)
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Chuiko Institute of Surface Chemistry (UA), B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine (UA)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.