Long-term nitrogen fertilization does not necessarily suppress soil nitrogen mineralization via enzymatic pathways

Nitrogen (N) fertilization supports high yields of cereal crops, but the extent to which such exogenous N inputs may impact soil N provisioning through enzyme-catalyzed depolymerization and mineralization is contested. We tested the hypothesis that exogenous N inputs suppress soil N mineralization by leveraging a long-term field experiment in an Argiudoll representative of the U.S. Midwest. We quantified: (1) total organic carbon (TOC) and N, (2) potentially mineralizable N (PMN) as a proxy for soil N provisioning capacity, (3) microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and (4) activities of 12 N-hydrolytic enzymes as proxies for N depolymerization-mineralization potential rates across a 42 y urea-based fertilization gradient of 0, 67, 135, 202, and 269 kg N ha −1 . Soil PMN, MBN, TN and N-hydrolytic enzyme activities, except for two aminopeptidase and urease activities, as well as MBC, TOC and C: N were unaffected by N fertilization (i.e., 0 vs 69–269 kg ha −1 ). Under N fertilization, we found weak evidence for suppression of N mineralization: relative to the lowest N fertilization rate (67 kg ha −1 ), PMN was 23% lower ( p = 0.104) at 269 kg ha −1 and four of eight aminopeptidase activities, either on soil mass or TOC basis, were 24–284% lower ( p = 0.031–0.091) at 202 kg ha −1 than the lowest N fertilization rate (67 kg ha −1 ), suggesting partial suppression of an intermediate step of multistep N depolymerization. Despite fertilization with urea, urease activity was 78–84% lower ( p = 0.019) at 202 kg N ha −1 than 0 and 67 kg N ha −1 . Overall, we do not find evidence that N fertilization across a wide range of rates suppresses soil N depolymerization and mineralization enzyme activities, nor potentially mineralizable N, in the long-term in maize-based agroecosystems situated on Mollisols that dominate the US Midwest. Given the reliance of the over 40 million ha of maize-based production on exogenous N inputs in the U.S. Corn Belt, our results suggest limited negative impacts on soil N mineralization in the long-term. • Soil N cycling was evaluated in a 42 y N fertilization gradient (0–269 kg ha −1 ). • Fertilization (0 vs 67–269 kg ha −1 ) did not impact N pool sizes or process rates. • Potentially mineralizable N was unaffected by N fertilization ( p = 0.12). • Certain soil aminopeptidase activities were lower at 202 than at 67 kg N ha −1 . • Soil protease, deaminase and chitinase activities unaffected by N fertilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soil Ecology
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2026.107014
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term nitrogen fertilization does not necessarily suppress soil nitrogen mineralization via enzymatic pathways

Andrew J. Margenot, Chammi P. Attanayake, Katie Indorante, Sara Eldessouky et al.
Applied Soil Ecology
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Long-term nitrogen fertilization does not necessarily suppress soil nitrogen mineralization via enzymatic pathways

Andrew J. Margenot, Chammi P. Attanayake, Katie Indorante, Sara Eldessouky, Maria B. Villamil, Chase S. Kasmerchak
article en

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertilization supports high yields of cereal crops, but the extent to which such exogenous N inputs may impact soil N provisioning through enzyme-catalyzed depolymerization and mineralization is contested. We tested the hypothesis that exogenous N inputs suppress soil N mineralization by leveraging a long-term field experiment in an Argiudoll representative of the U.S. Midwest. We quantified: (1) total organic carbon (TOC) and N, (2) potentially mineralizable N (PMN) as a proxy for soil N provisioning capacity, (3) microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and (4) activities of 12 N-hydrolytic enzymes as proxies for N depolymerization-mineralization potential rates across a 42 y urea-based fertilization gradient of 0, 67, 135, 202, and 269 kg N ha −1 . Soil PMN, MBN, TN and N-hydrolytic enzyme activities, except for two aminopeptidase and urease activities, as well as MBC, TOC and C: N were unaffected by N fertilization (i.e., 0 vs 69–269 kg ha −1 ). Under N fertilization, we found weak evidence for suppression of N mineralization: relative to the lowest N fertilization rate (67 kg ha −1 ), PMN was 23% lower ( p = 0.104) at 269 kg ha −1 and four of eight aminopeptidase activities, either on soil mass or TOC basis, were 24–284% lower ( p = 0.031–0.091) at 202 kg ha −1 than the lowest N fertilization rate (67 kg ha −1 ), suggesting partial suppression of an intermediate step of multistep N depolymerization. Despite fertilization with urea, urease activity was 78–84% lower ( p = 0.019) at 202 kg N ha −1 than 0 and 67 kg N ha −1 . Overall, we do not find evidence that N fertilization across a wide range of rates suppresses soil N depolymerization and mineralization enzyme activities, nor potentially mineralizable N, in the long-term in maize-based agroecosystems situated on Mollisols that dominate the US Midwest. Given the reliance of the over 40 million ha of maize-based production on exogenous N inputs in the U.S. Corn Belt, our results suggest limited negative impacts on soil N mineralization in the long-term. • Soil N cycling was evaluated in a 42 y N fertilization gradient (0–269 kg ha −1 ). • Fertilization (0 vs 67–269 kg ha −1 ) did not impact N pool sizes or process rates. • Potentially mineralizable N was unaffected by N fertilization ( p = 0.12). • Certain soil aminopeptidase activities were lower at 202 than at 67 kg N ha −1 . • Soil protease, deaminase and chitinase activities unaffected by N fertilization.

Applied Soil EcologyVol. 223
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Institute for Sustainability (GB)
National Science Foundation, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.