Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Meditation Practitioners versus Non Meditation Practitioners: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Recent rapid technological advancements and societal changes have dramatically transformed modern life, leading to a significant increase in mental health concerns. Meditation, an ancient practice, has gained considerable attention in recent years for its psychological and neurological benefits. Aim: To compare levels of depression, anxiety and stress between Meditation Practitioners (MPs) and Non meditation Practitioners (NMPs) and to examine the relationship between different parameters of meditation practice and levels of depression, anxiety and stress. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Humanities and Liberal Arts, DIT University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, from March 2024 to November 2024. Each participant was assessed for depression, anxiety and stress using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) scale. Various aspects of meditation practice were evaluated using a socio-demographic data sheet. Participants were higher education students residing in the northern region of India. Individuals with a minimum of one year of experience in any established meditation practice and who practiced meditation at least twice a week were classified as MPs. After applying the criteria, a total of 400 participants were included, with 200 MPs (Meditation group) and 200 NMPs (Non meditation group). Pearson’s correlation, independent t-tests and regression analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0. Results: The mean age of MPs was 21.80±4.4 years, while that of NMPs was 22.30±3.6 years. MPs demonstrated significantly lower levels of depression (MP=9.50±7.8; NMP=12.82±9.4; p<0.001), anxiety (MP=10.67±7.0; NMP=13.66±9.2; p<0.001), stress (MP=12.76±7.4; NMP=15.14±8.2; p<0.01) and total DASS scores (MP=32.92±19.5; NMP=41.62±24.0; p<0.001). Meditation experience showed a negative correlation with depression scores (r=-0.151; p<0.05), while frequency of weekly meditation practice demonstrated negative correlations with anxiety (r=-0.224; p<0.01). The total DASS scores were (r=-0.151; p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that meditation serves as an effective intervention strategy for improving mental health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/85024.23408
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Meditation Practitioners versus Non Meditation Practitioners: A Cross-sectional Study

Ram Kumar Gupta, Abhishek Kumar Bhardwaj
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Meditation Practitioners versus Non Meditation Practitioners: A Cross-sectional Study

Ram Kumar Gupta, Abhishek Kumar Bhardwaj
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Recent rapid technological advancements and societal changes have dramatically transformed modern life, leading to a significant increase in mental health concerns. Meditation, an ancient practice, has gained considerable attention in recent years for its psychological and neurological benefits. Aim: To compare levels of depression, anxiety and stress between Meditation Practitioners (MPs) and Non meditation Practitioners (NMPs) and to examine the relationship between different parameters of meditation practice and levels of depression, anxiety and stress. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Humanities and Liberal Arts, DIT University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, from March 2024 to November 2024. Each participant was assessed for depression, anxiety and stress using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) scale. Various aspects of meditation practice were evaluated using a socio-demographic data sheet. Participants were higher education students residing in the northern region of India. Individuals with a minimum of one year of experience in any established meditation practice and who practiced meditation at least twice a week were classified as MPs. After applying the criteria, a total of 400 participants were included, with 200 MPs (Meditation group) and 200 NMPs (Non meditation group). Pearson’s correlation, independent t-tests and regression analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0. Results: The mean age of MPs was 21.80±4.4 years, while that of NMPs was 22.30±3.6 years. MPs demonstrated significantly lower levels of depression (MP=9.50±7.8; NMP=12.82±9.4; p<0.001), anxiety (MP=10.67±7.0; NMP=13.66±9.2; p<0.001), stress (MP=12.76±7.4; NMP=15.14±8.2; p<0.01) and total DASS scores (MP=32.92±19.5; NMP=41.62±24.0; p<0.001). Meditation experience showed a negative correlation with depression scores (r=-0.151; p<0.05), while frequency of weekly meditation practice demonstrated negative correlations with anxiety (r=-0.224; p<0.01). The total DASS scores were (r=-0.151; p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that meditation serves as an effective intervention strategy for improving mental health.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.