Centring the child's experience: A synthesis of evidence for measuring outcomes in Barnahus

BACKGROUND: Multi-agency responses to child abuse, such as the Barnahus and Children's Advocacy Center models aim to provide holistic, child-friendly interventions. However, evaluation of these services tends to rely on procedural metrics (e.g., conviction rates), overlooking the experiences of primary service users. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence regarding children's experiences of child protection, criminal justice, medical, and therapeutic responses to identify child-centered outcome domains. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The review included 51 peer-reviewed studies and reports published between 2015 and 2025. Participants included cohorts of children (n = 33), adult survivors reflecting on childhood experiences (n = 8), and mixed groups (n = 10) from Europe, North America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across five databases (PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and Proquest Social Sciences). Data were analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach to identify cross-cutting domains of service quality from the perspective of children and young people. RESULTS: Five primary outcome domains were identified: (1) The Professional Relationship (trust, kindness, and being believed); (2) Empowerment and Participation (agency and clear information); (3) Safety and Security (emotional, physical, and procedural safety); (4) Holistic Wellbeing (trauma-informed, timely support); and (5) Systemic Efficacy (coordination to minimize re-telling). Children currently in the system prioritized immediate information and safety, while adult survivors emphasized the long-term impact of respectful professional relationships. CONCLUSIONS: For children, the process of intervention is as significant as the formal outcome. High-quality responses are defined by relational safety and empowering children's participation. Evaluation frameworks for multi-agency models should incorporate these experiential domains to ensure accountability to children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Abuse & Neglect
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.108067
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centring the child's experience: A synthesis of evidence for measuring outcomes in Barnahus

Camille Warrington, Rachael A. Tindal, Silvie Bovarnick, Mary Mitchell et al.
Child Abuse & Neglect
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Centring the child's experience: A synthesis of evidence for measuring outcomes in Barnahus

Camille Warrington, Rachael A. Tindal, Silvie Bovarnick, Mary Mitchell, James L. Herbert
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multi-agency responses to child abuse, such as the Barnahus and Children's Advocacy Center models aim to provide holistic, child-friendly interventions. However, evaluation of these services tends to rely on procedural metrics (e.g., conviction rates), overlooking the experiences of primary service users. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence regarding children's experiences of child protection, criminal justice, medical, and therapeutic responses to identify child-centered outcome domains. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The review included 51 peer-reviewed studies and reports published between 2015 and 2025. Participants included cohorts of children (n = 33), adult survivors reflecting on childhood experiences (n = 8), and mixed groups (n = 10) from Europe, North America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across five databases (PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and Proquest Social Sciences). Data were analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach to identify cross-cutting domains of service quality from the perspective of children and young people. RESULTS: Five primary outcome domains were identified: (1) The Professional Relationship (trust, kindness, and being believed); (2) Empowerment and Participation (agency and clear information); (3) Safety and Security (emotional, physical, and procedural safety); (4) Holistic Wellbeing (trauma-informed, timely support); and (5) Systemic Efficacy (coordination to minimize re-telling). Children currently in the system prioritized immediate information and safety, while adult survivors emphasized the long-term impact of respectful professional relationships. CONCLUSIONS: For children, the process of intervention is as significant as the formal outcome. High-quality responses are defined by relational safety and empowering children's participation. Evaluation frameworks for multi-agency models should incorporate these experiential domains to ensure accountability to children.

Child Abuse & NeglectVol. 176
University of Bedfordshire (GB), University of Hildesheim (DE), Department for Child Protection and Family Support (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Oak Foundation
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.