Multicenter Natural History Study and Long-Term Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Usher Syndrome Subtypes

OBJECTIVES: Usher syndrome (USH) is an inherited disorder that causes bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), retinitis pigmentosa, and vestibular defects. It represents the most common cause of combined deaf-blindness worldwide. Mutations in the nine known underlying genes are categorized into three types: USH type 1 has the earliest, most severe onset, while the much more common USH type 2 is comparatively mild with delayed onset and moderate symptoms. USH type 3 is very rare and exhibits variable clinical manifestations. The current standard of care for SNHL in USH is comprised of conventional hearing aids and/or cochlear implantation depending on the severity of symptoms. However, existing studies on treatment outcomes generally have rather short follow-up durations from a single institution and rarely distinguish between the individual USH subtypes. DESIGN: This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed 655 audiograms of 33 patients (66 ears) with genetically confirmed USH. Patient-specific characteristics and treatments were correlated with pure-tone average thresholds and speech perception performance over a mean (SD) of 7 yrs and 10 mo (9 yrs and 11 mo) overall and 8 yrs and 2 mo (6 yrs and 3 mo) after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Conventional hearing aids improved thresholds on average (SD) by 20.1 (10.9) dB HL regardless of age, but aided hearing still deteriorated concurrently with the natural progression of SNHL. In patients with severe-to-profound SNHL or complete deafness, cochlear implantation rescued hearing to average thresholds of 37.9 (7.0) dB HL 1 yr post-implantation, 37.3 (10.3) dB HL after 2 years, and 27.5 (7.1) dB HL after 15 to 20 yrs. Every single patient who received an implant benefited from it, irrespective of the age at implantation or the causative USH mutation. CONCLUSIONS: With new gene therapies for USH in development, the findings reported here can serve as a benchmark for the comparison of novel treatments with the current clinical standard of care around the world. Larger-scale studies with more consistent monitoring of hearing and speech perception ability, as well as more extensive genetic testing, could further elucidate the benefits of current treatments for different (sub-)types of USH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001822
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter Natural History Study and Long-Term Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Usher Syndrome Subtypes

Anselm Joseph Gadenstaetter, Markus Ritter, Dominik Riss, Christoph Arnoldner et al.
Ear and Hearing
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Multicenter Natural History Study and Long-Term Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Usher Syndrome Subtypes

Anselm Joseph Gadenstaetter, Markus Ritter, Dominik Riss, Christoph Arnoldner, Thomas Parzefall, Nadia Giarbini, Lukas D. Landegger, Maximilian Pawloff, Paul Emmerich Krumpoeck, Wolfgang Gstoettner, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Takeshi Fujita, Natsumi Uehara, Anna Landegger
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Usher syndrome (USH) is an inherited disorder that causes bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), retinitis pigmentosa, and vestibular defects. It represents the most common cause of combined deaf-blindness worldwide. Mutations in the nine known underlying genes are categorized into three types: USH type 1 has the earliest, most severe onset, while the much more common USH type 2 is comparatively mild with delayed onset and moderate symptoms. USH type 3 is very rare and exhibits variable clinical manifestations. The current standard of care for SNHL in USH is comprised of conventional hearing aids and/or cochlear implantation depending on the severity of symptoms. However, existing studies on treatment outcomes generally have rather short follow-up durations from a single institution and rarely distinguish between the individual USH subtypes. DESIGN: This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed 655 audiograms of 33 patients (66 ears) with genetically confirmed USH. Patient-specific characteristics and treatments were correlated with pure-tone average thresholds and speech perception performance over a mean (SD) of 7 yrs and 10 mo (9 yrs and 11 mo) overall and 8 yrs and 2 mo (6 yrs and 3 mo) after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Conventional hearing aids improved thresholds on average (SD) by 20.1 (10.9) dB HL regardless of age, but aided hearing still deteriorated concurrently with the natural progression of SNHL. In patients with severe-to-profound SNHL or complete deafness, cochlear implantation rescued hearing to average thresholds of 37.9 (7.0) dB HL 1 yr post-implantation, 37.3 (10.3) dB HL after 2 years, and 27.5 (7.1) dB HL after 15 to 20 yrs. Every single patient who received an implant benefited from it, irrespective of the age at implantation or the causative USH mutation. CONCLUSIONS: With new gene therapies for USH in development, the findings reported here can serve as a benchmark for the comparison of novel treatments with the current clinical standard of care around the world. Larger-scale studies with more consistent monitoring of hearing and speech perception ability, as well as more extensive genetic testing, could further elucidate the benefits of current treatments for different (sub-)types of USH.

Ear and Hearing
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Ferrara (IT), Vienna General Hospital (AT), Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Christian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity (AT), Kobe University (JP), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.