Risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in stroke patients and to provide a reference for future model development and clinical research. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP, and SinoMed, to identify studies on VTE risk prediction models in stroke patients. Databases were searched from inception to September 1, 2025. Risk of bias and applicability of the prediction models were assessed using the PROBAST checklist. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled VTE incidence and the area under the curve (AUC) for model performance using Stata 17.0. Results: A total of 2,726 records were retrieved, and seven prediction models were included. Reported VTE incidence ranged from 9.8% to 38.9%, with AUC values between 0.781 and 0.978, indicating moderate to high apparent discriminative performance, however, this should be interpreted with caution in light of the high risk of bias and lack of external validation. None of the seven included models underwent independent external validation, and according to PROBAST, all included models were judged to be at high overall risk of bias. The pooled VTE incidence was 20.8% (95% CI: 14.7%-27.0%), and the pooled AUC across six models was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93). Conclusion: Among the VTE risk prediction models for stroke patients included in this study, although some models demonstrated favorable predictive performance, all models were judged to be at high risk of bias according to PROBAST. Future research should prioritize the validation and refinement of existing models or the development of new models with more rigorous methodological design, in order to better support clinical decision-making for patients with stroke. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024603132, PROSPERO CRD42024603132.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1788144
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kairu Feng, Xinjie Li, Zubair Muhammad, Chunyan Cui et al.
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kairu Feng, Xinjie Li, Zubair Muhammad, Chunyan Cui, Meng Wang, Nan Liu, Lina Fu
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in stroke patients and to provide a reference for future model development and clinical research. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP, and SinoMed, to identify studies on VTE risk prediction models in stroke patients. Databases were searched from inception to September 1, 2025. Risk of bias and applicability of the prediction models were assessed using the PROBAST checklist. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled VTE incidence and the area under the curve (AUC) for model performance using Stata 17.0. Results: A total of 2,726 records were retrieved, and seven prediction models were included. Reported VTE incidence ranged from 9.8% to 38.9%, with AUC values between 0.781 and 0.978, indicating moderate to high apparent discriminative performance, however, this should be interpreted with caution in light of the high risk of bias and lack of external validation. None of the seven included models underwent independent external validation, and according to PROBAST, all included models were judged to be at high overall risk of bias. The pooled VTE incidence was 20.8% (95% CI: 14.7%-27.0%), and the pooled AUC across six models was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93). Conclusion: Among the VTE risk prediction models for stroke patients included in this study, although some models demonstrated favorable predictive performance, all models were judged to be at high risk of bias according to PROBAST. Future research should prioritize the validation and refinement of existing models or the development of new models with more rigorous methodological design, in order to better support clinical decision-making for patients with stroke. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024603132, PROSPERO CRD42024603132.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Shenzhen University Health Science Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.