Dissecting Storage I/O Tracing Overhead of eBPF: A Component-Level Analysis

Extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) has become a key technology for low-overhead observability in Linux-based systems, enabling secure, dynamic and programmable tracing of kernel subsystems. However, when applied to intensive storage I/O workloads, the actual performance impact of eBPF tracing and the related cost of its internal components remain insufficiently characterized. In this paper, we present a component-level analysis of eBPF-based I/O tracing, focusing on the I/O execution path and proposing a decomposition of the tracing pipeline into its main cost factors. To quantify the cost of each stage, we introduce a controlled experimental framework that incrementally enables tracing components to isolate their individual overhead. Our results show that eBPF tracing overhead is highly workload-dependent, reaching up to 41% under small I/O requests with high concurrency. A component-level analysis identifies userspace event retrieval and probe triggering as the primary bottlenecks, responsible for up to 24% and 11% of the overall overhead, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3805687.3806254
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissecting Storage I/O Tracing Overhead of eBPF: A Component-Level Analysis

Stéphane Rubini, Jalil Boukhobza, Mohammed Naas, Pierre Olivier et al.
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
article

Dissecting Storage I/O Tracing Overhead of eBPF: A Component-Level Analysis

Stéphane Rubini, Jalil Boukhobza, Mohammed Naas, Pierre Olivier, Frank Singhoff
article en

Abstract

Extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) has become a key technology for low-overhead observability in Linux-based systems, enabling secure, dynamic and programmable tracing of kernel subsystems. However, when applied to intensive storage I/O workloads, the actual performance impact of eBPF tracing and the related cost of its internal components remain insufficiently characterized. In this paper, we present a component-level analysis of eBPF-based I/O tracing, focusing on the I/O execution path and proposing a decomposition of the tracing pipeline into its main cost factors. To quantify the cost of each stage, we introduce a controlled experimental framework that incrementally enables tracing components to isolate their individual overhead. Our results show that eBPF tracing overhead is highly workload-dependent, reaching up to 41% under small I/O requests with high concurrency. A component-level analysis identifies userspace event retrieval and probe triggering as the primary bottlenecks, responsible for up to 24% and 11% of the overall overhead, respectively.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), University of Manchester (GB), Laboratoire des Sciences et Techniques de l’Information de la Communication et de la Connaissance (FR), La Rochelle Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.