An integrated analytics method for structured accident analysis and safety decision support in construction

Construction sites remain high-risk environments, with thousands of accidents occurring each year. Although large amounts of accident records exist globally, much of this information is stored as unstructured free-text comments, limiting its usefulness for systematic analysis. This study addresses this gap by developing an artificial intelligence (AI)–based methodol- ogy to transform unstructured accident descriptions into structured insights. Approximately 12,000 construction site accidents from multiple countries were analyzed, initially written in nearly 20 languages and containing minimal structured data. The aim of this research is to automatically classify accidents into meaningful root causes using large language models (LLMs) and to leverage these classifications to improve understanding of accident mech- anisms and guide safety interventions. LLM-enhanced processing enabled the extraction of contextual variables and the identification of prioritized root causes for each case. The analysis was conducted across several levels, from descriptive comparisons (e.g., severity by country or season) to more advanced network analysis of chained root causes. A focused case study of a single site with more than 1200 accidents provided deeper insights into re- curring failures and the prevalence of worker-attributed causes. Validation through manual classification of 150 accidents showed a 100% match with the LLM-generated categories, demonstrating the reliability of the proposed approach. Findings reveal variations in acci- dent patterns across economic contexts and raise concerns about the frequent attribution of responsibility to workers. Based on the extracted root causes, tailored policy recommenda- tions are proposed to support more effective safety strategies. This work contributes to a deeper, data-driven understanding of construction site risks and provides a scalable method to uncover systemic causes behind accidents. • Develop an analytics framework that converts narrative accident reports into structured inputs for safety decisions. • Classify large-scale construction accidents into actionable root causes to support data-driven risk management. • Analyze chains of interconnected accident causes to reveal escalation patterns affecting decision priorities. • Integrate accident severity into analytical models to improve the prioritization of safety interventions. • Uncover systematic bias in accident attribution to inform more balanced organizational safety decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decision Analytics Journal
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2026.100711
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrated analytics method for structured accident analysis and safety decision support in construction

Mohammed Itair, Mojtaba Eslahi, Rani El Meouche, Mohamad Al Omari et al.
1 citations
Decision Analytics Journal
Occupational Health and Safety Research
20.21
article

An integrated analytics method for structured accident analysis and safety decision support in construction

Mohammed Itair, Mojtaba Eslahi, Rani El Meouche, Mohamad Al Omari, Jérome Loywick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Construction sites remain high-risk environments, with thousands of accidents occurring each year. Although large amounts of accident records exist globally, much of this information is stored as unstructured free-text comments, limiting its usefulness for systematic analysis. This study addresses this gap by developing an artificial intelligence (AI)–based methodol- ogy to transform unstructured accident descriptions into structured insights. Approximately 12,000 construction site accidents from multiple countries were analyzed, initially written in nearly 20 languages and containing minimal structured data. The aim of this research is to automatically classify accidents into meaningful root causes using large language models (LLMs) and to leverage these classifications to improve understanding of accident mech- anisms and guide safety interventions. LLM-enhanced processing enabled the extraction of contextual variables and the identification of prioritized root causes for each case. The analysis was conducted across several levels, from descriptive comparisons (e.g., severity by country or season) to more advanced network analysis of chained root causes. A focused case study of a single site with more than 1200 accidents provided deeper insights into re- curring failures and the prevalence of worker-attributed causes. Validation through manual classification of 150 accidents showed a 100% match with the LLM-generated categories, demonstrating the reliability of the proposed approach. Findings reveal variations in acci- dent patterns across economic contexts and raise concerns about the frequent attribution of responsibility to workers. Based on the extracted root causes, tailored policy recommenda- tions are proposed to support more effective safety strategies. This work contributes to a deeper, data-driven understanding of construction site risks and provides a scalable method to uncover systemic causes behind accidents. • Develop an analytics framework that converts narrative accident reports into structured inputs for safety decisions. • Classify large-scale construction accidents into actionable root causes to support data-driven risk management. • Analyze chains of interconnected accident causes to reveal escalation patterns affecting decision priorities. • Integrate accident severity into analytical models to improve the prioritization of safety interventions. • Uncover systematic bias in accident attribution to inform more balanced organizational safety decisions.

Decision Analytics JournalVol. 19
Institut de France (FR), Bouygues (France) (FR), Laboratoire Angevin de Mécanique, Procédés et InnovAtion (FR), Aptiv (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
20.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.