Predicting progression from subjective cognitive decline to dementia using different neuropsychological criteria: A longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is considered a risk stage for future cognitive impairment and dementia. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether different neuropsychological criteria for defining cognitive normality influence SCD's ability to predict conversion to dementia. METHODS: Participants from the Cognitive Complaints Cohort were diagnosed according to the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative criteria. Normal cognition was defined by the absence of Mild Cognitive Impairment according to five Jak and Bondi criteria. Sociodemographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Bootstrap methods characterized group profiles given overlap between SCD definitions. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated time to dementia, and a clustered Cox proportional hazards model accounted for overlapping group membership and adjusted for baseline variables. RESULTS: Among 838 subjects, the five SCD groups showed similar age and sex distributions but differed in education, cognition, and functional status, while subjective complaints and depressive symptoms did not differ meaningfully. Kaplan-Meier curves showed variability in conversion probabilities. At five years, conversion ranged from 3.9% (Liberal) to 25.5% (Conservative); at ten years, from 16.2% to 40.9%. Clustered Cox analysis showed that Conservative and Historical SCD remained associated with higher hazard of conversion after adjustment, whereas Typical and Comprehensive SCD were associated with lower hazard estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological criteria for cognitive normality define SCD groups with distinct clinical profiles and risks of dementia. Broader definitions identify individuals at higher risk, whereas more stringent definitions capture populations with lower likelihood of decline, highlighting the importance of criterion selection according to clinical and research objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2026.106269
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting progression from subjective cognitive decline to dementia using different neuropsychological criteria: A longitudinal study

João Marôco, Pedro Câmara Pestana, Manuela Guerreiro, Frederico Simões do Couto et al.
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Predicting progression from subjective cognitive decline to dementia using different neuropsychological criteria: A longitudinal study

João Marôco, Pedro Câmara Pestana, Manuela Guerreiro, Frederico Simões do Couto, Sandra Cardoso, Alexandre Mendonca, F Jessen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is considered a risk stage for future cognitive impairment and dementia. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether different neuropsychological criteria for defining cognitive normality influence SCD's ability to predict conversion to dementia. METHODS: Participants from the Cognitive Complaints Cohort were diagnosed according to the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative criteria. Normal cognition was defined by the absence of Mild Cognitive Impairment according to five Jak and Bondi criteria. Sociodemographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Bootstrap methods characterized group profiles given overlap between SCD definitions. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated time to dementia, and a clustered Cox proportional hazards model accounted for overlapping group membership and adjusted for baseline variables. RESULTS: Among 838 subjects, the five SCD groups showed similar age and sex distributions but differed in education, cognition, and functional status, while subjective complaints and depressive symptoms did not differ meaningfully. Kaplan-Meier curves showed variability in conversion probabilities. At five years, conversion ranged from 3.9% (Liberal) to 25.5% (Conservative); at ten years, from 16.2% to 40.9%. Clustered Cox analysis showed that Conservative and Historical SCD remained associated with higher hazard of conversion after adjustment, whereas Typical and Comprehensive SCD were associated with lower hazard estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological criteria for cognitive normality define SCD groups with distinct clinical profiles and risks of dementia. Broader definitions identify individuals at higher risk, whereas more stringent definitions capture populations with lower likelihood of decline, highlighting the importance of criterion selection according to clinical and research objectives.

Archives of Gerontology and GeriatricsVol. 148
University of Lisbon (PT), University of Cologne (DE), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.