Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramic Overlays and Full-Coverage Crowns for Maxillary Premolars

Objective: CAD-CAM technology enables biomimetic dentistry by producing highly accurate, minimally invasive restorations that replicate the biomechanical behavior of intact teeth. This study evaluated the fracture resistance of overlays with margins at different supragingival levels, including a flat occlusal design and compared them with conventional full crowns. All restorations were fabricated from chairside CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramic for maxillary premolars. Methods and Materials: Sixty-four CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramic restorations were fabricated and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 16): (1) overlay with a margin 2 mm above the gingiva (Ov2m); (2) overlay with a 4 mm supragingival margin (Ov4m); (3) overlay with a 4 mm margin and flat occlusal surface (OvF4m); and (4) full-coverage crown with a gingival-level margin (FCC). Preparations were standardized by one operator. Restorations were adhesively cemented to resin dies, thermocycled 10,000 times (5–55 °C), and loaded to failure in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests (α = 0.001). Results: Among overlays, Ov2m showed the highest fracture resistance (1605 ± 88 N), followed by Ov4m (1403 ± 63 N). OvF4m recorded the lowest value (1257 ± 73 N). FCC exhibited the greatest overall resistance (1838 ± 106 N), significantly higher than that of any overlay group. Conclusions: Overlays with margins 2 mm above the gingiva had higher fracture resistance than those with more coronal margins or flat occlusal designs. Full-coverage crowns showed the greatest strength, highlighting the impact of margin position and preparation design on restoration performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomimetics
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11050291
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramic Overlays and Full-Coverage Crowns for Maxillary Premolars

Ali Mohamed, Carlos Alberto Jurado, Silvia Rojas‐Rueda, Márk Antal et al.
Biomimetics
Dental materials and restorations
article

Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramic Overlays and Full-Coverage Crowns for Maxillary Premolars

Ali Mohamed, Carlos Alberto Jurado, Silvia Rojas‐Rueda, Márk Antal, Hamid Nurrohman, Brian Morrow, Stella Mireles, Franklin Garcia-Godoy
article en

Abstract

Objective: CAD-CAM technology enables biomimetic dentistry by producing highly accurate, minimally invasive restorations that replicate the biomechanical behavior of intact teeth. This study evaluated the fracture resistance of overlays with margins at different supragingival levels, including a flat occlusal design and compared them with conventional full crowns. All restorations were fabricated from chairside CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramic for maxillary premolars. Methods and Materials: Sixty-four CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramic restorations were fabricated and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 16): (1) overlay with a margin 2 mm above the gingiva (Ov2m); (2) overlay with a 4 mm supragingival margin (Ov4m); (3) overlay with a 4 mm margin and flat occlusal surface (OvF4m); and (4) full-coverage crown with a gingival-level margin (FCC). Preparations were standardized by one operator. Restorations were adhesively cemented to resin dies, thermocycled 10,000 times (5–55 °C), and loaded to failure in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests (α = 0.001). Results: Among overlays, Ov2m showed the highest fracture resistance (1605 ± 88 N), followed by Ov4m (1403 ± 63 N). OvF4m recorded the lowest value (1257 ± 73 N). FCC exhibited the greatest overall resistance (1838 ± 106 N), significantly higher than that of any overlay group. Conclusions: Overlays with margins 2 mm above the gingiva had higher fracture resistance than those with more coronal margins or flat occlusal designs. Full-coverage crowns showed the greatest strength, highlighting the impact of margin position and preparation design on restoration performance.

BiomimeticsVol. 11(5)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Ponce Health Sciences University (PR), University of Szeged (HU), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.