Non-Conformity in Online Marketplace Listings of Coloured Stones: Eight Months of Laboratory Verification, September 2024 to May 2025

Research Note documenting a laboratory-based verification campaign of 851 coloured gemstones purchased from 12+ online marketplaces over an eight-month period (September 2024 to May 2025). The study applies a multi-instrument gemmological protocol (RI, SG, darkfield microscopy, FTIR, UV-Vis-NIR, Raman spectroscopy, EDXRF, gamma spectrometry) to quantify non-conformity rates, undeclared treatments, certificate substitution patterns, and radioactivity screening thresholds encountered in external-market listings. Key findings: overall non-conformity rate of 87% (combined misrepresentation and incomplete delivery), 62% undeclared treatments (including 80% of emeralds and near-100% of topazes), certificate substitution on 100% of encountered GIA and Lotus reports within the sample, and 48 stones (approximately 5.6%) exceeding the 74 Bq/g radioactivity threshold. Ten marketplace archetypes are catalogued taxonomically. Instrumentation: Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS5 FTIR, Magilabs GemmoSphere UV-Vis-NIR, Renishaw Raman, Bruker Tracer 5i EDXRF, Nikon SMZ1270 gemmological microscope, Eickhorst LED refractometer, Ortec DigiBASE gamma spectrometer, Mettler Toledo NewClassic MS balance, plus polariscope, dichroscope, and UV lamps (365 nm and 254 nm). Authors: Pierre Lafrance (GG, GIA), Laboratoire Gem Quebec, Laval, Canada. Nathalie Thomas (GG, GIA), Gem and Mineral Federation of Canada, Kitchener, Canada. Declaration of interest: Laboratoire Gem Quebec is a commercial gemmological laboratory. No commercial relationship exists between the authors and any of the stones, vendors, or platforms analysed. The study was self-funded by Laboratoire Gem Quebec. License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Preferred attribution When citing or reusing this work, the authors appreciate the following attribution format: Lafrance, P., & Thomas, N. (2026). Non-Conformity in Online Marketplace Listings of Coloured Stones: Eight Months of Laboratory Verification, September 2024 to May 2025. Laboratoire Gem Quebec. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19699431. Available at https://www.labgemquebec.com/etude-pierre-couleur The paper is free and open under CC BY 4.0. Notification of reuse is appreciated but not required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19699431
Primary Topic
Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Conformity in Online Marketplace Listings of Coloured Stones: Eight Months of Laboratory Verification, September 2024 to May 2025

Pierre Lafrance, Nathalie Thomas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
article

Non-Conformity in Online Marketplace Listings of Coloured Stones: Eight Months of Laboratory Verification, September 2024 to May 2025

Pierre Lafrance, Nathalie Thomas
article en

Abstract

Research Note documenting a laboratory-based verification campaign of 851 coloured gemstones purchased from 12+ online marketplaces over an eight-month period (September 2024 to May 2025). The study applies a multi-instrument gemmological protocol (RI, SG, darkfield microscopy, FTIR, UV-Vis-NIR, Raman spectroscopy, EDXRF, gamma spectrometry) to quantify non-conformity rates, undeclared treatments, certificate substitution patterns, and radioactivity screening thresholds encountered in external-market listings. Key findings: overall non-conformity rate of 87% (combined misrepresentation and incomplete delivery), 62% undeclared treatments (including 80% of emeralds and near-100% of topazes), certificate substitution on 100% of encountered GIA and Lotus reports within the sample, and 48 stones (approximately 5.6%) exceeding the 74 Bq/g radioactivity threshold. Ten marketplace archetypes are catalogued taxonomically. Instrumentation: Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS5 FTIR, Magilabs GemmoSphere UV-Vis-NIR, Renishaw Raman, Bruker Tracer 5i EDXRF, Nikon SMZ1270 gemmological microscope, Eickhorst LED refractometer, Ortec DigiBASE gamma spectrometer, Mettler Toledo NewClassic MS balance, plus polariscope, dichroscope, and UV lamps (365 nm and 254 nm). Authors: Pierre Lafrance (GG, GIA), Laboratoire Gem Quebec, Laval, Canada. Nathalie Thomas (GG, GIA), Gem and Mineral Federation of Canada, Kitchener, Canada. Declaration of interest: Laboratoire Gem Quebec is a commercial gemmological laboratory. No commercial relationship exists between the authors and any of the stones, vendors, or platforms analysed. The study was self-funded by Laboratoire Gem Quebec. License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Preferred attribution When citing or reusing this work, the authors appreciate the following attribution format: Lafrance, P., & Thomas, N. (2026). Non-Conformity in Online Marketplace Listings of Coloured Stones: Eight Months of Laboratory Verification, September 2024 to May 2025. Laboratoire Gem Quebec. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19699431. Available at https://www.labgemquebec.com/etude-pierre-couleur The paper is free and open under CC BY 4.0. Notification of reuse is appreciated but not required.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hudbay Minerals (Canada) (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.