A Life Cycle Costing Approach of Potential Carbon Capture and Storage at the Hunter Unit 3 Coal-Fired Power Plant, Utah

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is widely regarded as a viable pathway for reducing greenhouse gas emissions; however, large-scale deployment remains constrained by project economics and policy uncertainty. This study presents a life cycle costing assessment of a proposed CCS retrofit at the Hunter Unit 3 coal-fired power plant in Emery County, Utah, encompassing carbon capture, transport, and subsurface storage. Results indicate that the project appears economically favorable under the assumptions of this screening-level analysis and under current policy conditions, with an estimated break-even time of approximately five years. The analysis identifies a large upfront capital investment exceeding $600,000,000, offset by planned revenue from federal tax credits totaling several billion dollars over the project lifetime. Sensitivity analyses show that project economics are dominated by capture costs and annual mass of CO2 sequestration rates, while storage and transport costs play secondary roles. A synthetic policy-perturbation analysis of the $85/ton tax credit further demonstrates that policy volatility materially increases uncertainty in investment returns. These results highlight both the economic potential of CCS retrofits at existing power plants and the critical role of stable long-term policy in enabling investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092010
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Life Cycle Costing Approach of Potential Carbon Capture and Storage at the Hunter Unit 3 Coal-Fired Power Plant, Utah

Kevin L. McCormack, Kody M. Powell, Palash Panja, Brian J. O. L. McPherson et al.
Energies
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

A Life Cycle Costing Approach of Potential Carbon Capture and Storage at the Hunter Unit 3 Coal-Fired Power Plant, Utah

Kevin L. McCormack, Kody M. Powell, Palash Panja, Brian J. O. L. McPherson, Pratt Rogers, Eric Edelman, Ethan Gallup
article en

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is widely regarded as a viable pathway for reducing greenhouse gas emissions; however, large-scale deployment remains constrained by project economics and policy uncertainty. This study presents a life cycle costing assessment of a proposed CCS retrofit at the Hunter Unit 3 coal-fired power plant in Emery County, Utah, encompassing carbon capture, transport, and subsurface storage. Results indicate that the project appears economically favorable under the assumptions of this screening-level analysis and under current policy conditions, with an estimated break-even time of approximately five years. The analysis identifies a large upfront capital investment exceeding $600,000,000, offset by planned revenue from federal tax credits totaling several billion dollars over the project lifetime. Sensitivity analyses show that project economics are dominated by capture costs and annual mass of CO2 sequestration rates, while storage and transport costs play secondary roles. A synthetic policy-perturbation analysis of the $85/ton tax credit further demonstrates that policy volatility materially increases uncertainty in investment returns. These results highlight both the economic potential of CCS retrofits at existing power plants and the critical role of stable long-term policy in enabling investment.

EnergiesVol. 19(9)
University of Utah (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Life Cycle Costing Approach of Potential Carbon Capture and Storage at the Hunter Unit 3 Coal-Fired Power Plant, Utah — Kevin L. McCormack, Kody M. Powell, et al. · Energies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS