Outcomes of a third course of salvage spine stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a single-institution case series

Re-irradiation with salvage spine stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) has emerged as a viable strategy for spinal metastases with progressive disease. We report the characteristics and clinical outcomes of spinal segments that received at least three courses of sSRS. 10 spinal segments in 6 patients who received at least three courses of sSRS were evaluated from an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective single-institution database. Overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Radiographic failure was defined as progression on imaging at the treated segment. Median follow-up was 8.9 months (range, 0.2–46.3). Three patients had died at the time of analysis. Median age at treatment was 63.2 years (range, 36.9–77.2), and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 80 (range, 70–90). The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 50.0%. The median cumulative thecal sac EQD22.5 Dmax after the third course of sSRS was 137.9 Gy (range, 97–227.5). The median third course re-irradiation sSRS thecal sac EQD22.5 Dmax was 37.15 Gy (range, 21.8–57.8). 30% (3/10) of treated segments had radiographic progression, with a 6-month rPFS rate of 85.7%. 28.6% (2/7) of treatment courses resulted in pain flare. No cases of vertebral compression fracture (VCF), radiation myelopathy, or neuritis were reported. Three courses of sSRS may be considered for salvage treatment of progressive spinal metastases. Given that cumulative neural structure doses exceed established thresholds, careful multidisciplinary review of all treatment options including surgery and other ablative treatments is essential before proceeding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05581-9
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of a third course of salvage spine stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a single-institution case series

A. Magnelli, Samuel T. Chao, Erin S. Murphy, Jessica J. Bai et al.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Outcomes of a third course of salvage spine stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a single-institution case series

A. Magnelli, Samuel T. Chao, Erin S. Murphy, Jessica J. Bai, Praveen Pendyala, Ehsan H. Balagamwala, Lilyana Angelov, John H. Suh
article en

Abstract

Re-irradiation with salvage spine stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) has emerged as a viable strategy for spinal metastases with progressive disease. We report the characteristics and clinical outcomes of spinal segments that received at least three courses of sSRS. 10 spinal segments in 6 patients who received at least three courses of sSRS were evaluated from an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective single-institution database. Overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Radiographic failure was defined as progression on imaging at the treated segment. Median follow-up was 8.9 months (range, 0.2–46.3). Three patients had died at the time of analysis. Median age at treatment was 63.2 years (range, 36.9–77.2), and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 80 (range, 70–90). The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 50.0%. The median cumulative thecal sac EQD22.5 Dmax after the third course of sSRS was 137.9 Gy (range, 97–227.5). The median third course re-irradiation sSRS thecal sac EQD22.5 Dmax was 37.15 Gy (range, 21.8–57.8). 30% (3/10) of treated segments had radiographic progression, with a 6-month rPFS rate of 85.7%. 28.6% (2/7) of treatment courses resulted in pain flare. No cases of vertebral compression fracture (VCF), radiation myelopathy, or neuritis were reported. Three courses of sSRS may be considered for salvage treatment of progressive spinal metastases. Given that cumulative neural structure doses exceed established thresholds, careful multidisciplinary review of all treatment options including surgery and other ablative treatments is essential before proceeding.

Journal of Neuro-OncologyVol. 177(3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Foundation (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), University School (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.