Canola Fiber as Reinforcement for Composites: Effect of Fiber Extraction and Processing Method on Fiber Properties, Nonwoven Manufacturing, and Composite Properties

ABSTRACT Canola fibers obtained from discarded stalks through various processing methods, including water‐retting and field‐retting followed by mechanical decortication and enzymatic degradation, were utilized as discontinuous fibers to manufacture preforms via needle punching process for composites. The enzyme‐treated canola fibers exhibited higher density and percentage cellulose content than water‐retted and field‐retted fibers. Both the average tensile modulus and strength of water‐retted fibers exhibited approximately 94% increase after enzyme treatment, while the properties of field‐retted fibers were observed to fall in between water‐retted and enzyme‐treated fibers. The volumetric flow rate in mats decreased with increasing fiber length and decreasing fiber diameter. For a given fiber length, water‐retted canola fiber composite with a V f of 7.9 ± 0.7 exhibited a longitudinal tensile modulus ( E L ) of 3.7 ± 0.6 GPa and strength ( σ L ) of 7.4 ± 0.8 MPa, and enzyme‐treated composite with V f of 24.8 ± 1.9 exhibited E L of 15.9 ± 1.2 GPa and σ L of 32.6 ± 2.8 MPa. The field‐retted composite exhibited a V f of 19.4 ± 2.8, an E L of 11.3 ± 0.7 GPa, and a σ L of 10.9 ± 0.4 MPa, lying in between water‐retted and enzyme‐treated composites evaluated for the same fiber length. The difference in longitudinal (15.9 ± 1.2 GPa) and transverse (12.8 ± 0.6 GPa) tensile modulus of the enzyme‐treated composite indicates the preferential alignment of fibers in needle‐punched mats. Needle punching also resulted in a reduction in diameter distribution in the mats, contributing to an increase in fiber modulus, as well as the tensile modulus of composites. Enzyme‐treated canola fibers exhibited the highest surface roughness, and the composites exhibited strong fiber‐matrix interface, as evident from the fractographs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.71139
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canola Fiber as Reinforcement for Composites: Effect of Fiber Extraction and Processing Method on Fiber Properties, Nonwoven Manufacturing, and Composite Properties

Mashiur Rahman, Raghavan Jayaraman, Md Shadhin
Polymer Composites
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
article

Canola Fiber as Reinforcement for Composites: Effect of Fiber Extraction and Processing Method on Fiber Properties, Nonwoven Manufacturing, and Composite Properties

Mashiur Rahman, Raghavan Jayaraman, Md Shadhin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Canola fibers obtained from discarded stalks through various processing methods, including water‐retting and field‐retting followed by mechanical decortication and enzymatic degradation, were utilized as discontinuous fibers to manufacture preforms via needle punching process for composites. The enzyme‐treated canola fibers exhibited higher density and percentage cellulose content than water‐retted and field‐retted fibers. Both the average tensile modulus and strength of water‐retted fibers exhibited approximately 94% increase after enzyme treatment, while the properties of field‐retted fibers were observed to fall in between water‐retted and enzyme‐treated fibers. The volumetric flow rate in mats decreased with increasing fiber length and decreasing fiber diameter. For a given fiber length, water‐retted canola fiber composite with a V f of 7.9 ± 0.7 exhibited a longitudinal tensile modulus ( E L ) of 3.7 ± 0.6 GPa and strength ( σ L ) of 7.4 ± 0.8 MPa, and enzyme‐treated composite with V f of 24.8 ± 1.9 exhibited E L of 15.9 ± 1.2 GPa and σ L of 32.6 ± 2.8 MPa. The field‐retted composite exhibited a V f of 19.4 ± 2.8, an E L of 11.3 ± 0.7 GPa, and a σ L of 10.9 ± 0.4 MPa, lying in between water‐retted and enzyme‐treated composites evaluated for the same fiber length. The difference in longitudinal (15.9 ± 1.2 GPa) and transverse (12.8 ± 0.6 GPa) tensile modulus of the enzyme‐treated composite indicates the preferential alignment of fibers in needle‐punched mats. Needle punching also resulted in a reduction in diameter distribution in the mats, contributing to an increase in fiber modulus, as well as the tensile modulus of composites. Enzyme‐treated canola fibers exhibited the highest surface roughness, and the composites exhibited strong fiber‐matrix interface, as evident from the fractographs.

Polymer Composites
Dalhousie University (CA), Research Manitoba (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.