Nausea and vomiting as adverse events of oliceridine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continue to be some of the most common and troublesome complications following anesthesia. Oliceridine, a G protein-biased µ-opioid receptor agonist, has the potential to provide effective pain relief while reducing the incidence of opioid-associated side effects. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oliceridine for preventing PONV compared with morphine and a placebo. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception up to 30 September 2025, without any language limitations. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oliceridine with morphine or placebo were included. Outcomes included incidence of nausea, vomiting, and other opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Results: This meta-analysis included five studies, with a total of 1,767 patients. The pooled analysis showed that oliceridine significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea compared with morphine (risk ratio [RR] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.90). In dose-specific analyses, the RRs were 0.58 (95% CI = 0.50-0.67) for the 0.1 mg group, 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74-0.92) for the 0.35 mg group, and 1.00 (95% CI = 0.91-1.11) for the 0.5 mg group. Oliceridine also decreased the risk of postoperative vomiting (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.45-0.67) relative to morphine. Subgroup analyses yielded RRs of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31-0.50), 0.54 (95% CI = 0.38-0.78), and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.68-0.95) for the 0.1 mg, 0.35 mg, and 0.5 mg groups, respectively. Moreover, oliceridine appeared to lower the incidence of opioid-related adverse events, including dizziness (RR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.76-1.04), dry mouth (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.37-0.69), pruritus (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.35-0.70), and somnolence (RR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.45-0.82). Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low. Conclusion: Oliceridine, particularly at 0.1-0.35 mg demand doses, reduces PONV and several opioid-related adverse events compared with morphine while maintaining effective analgesia. However, compared with placebo, typical opioid adverse effects remain. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024604703, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42024604703).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1779641
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nausea and vomiting as adverse events of oliceridine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jinfang Zeng, Jinjin Jian, Minmin Zhu, Shu Yang
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Nausea and vomiting as adverse events of oliceridine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jinfang Zeng, Jinjin Jian, Minmin Zhu, Shu Yang
article en

Abstract

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continue to be some of the most common and troublesome complications following anesthesia. Oliceridine, a G protein-biased µ-opioid receptor agonist, has the potential to provide effective pain relief while reducing the incidence of opioid-associated side effects. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oliceridine for preventing PONV compared with morphine and a placebo. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception up to 30 September 2025, without any language limitations. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oliceridine with morphine or placebo were included. Outcomes included incidence of nausea, vomiting, and other opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Results: This meta-analysis included five studies, with a total of 1,767 patients. The pooled analysis showed that oliceridine significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea compared with morphine (risk ratio [RR] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.90). In dose-specific analyses, the RRs were 0.58 (95% CI = 0.50-0.67) for the 0.1 mg group, 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74-0.92) for the 0.35 mg group, and 1.00 (95% CI = 0.91-1.11) for the 0.5 mg group. Oliceridine also decreased the risk of postoperative vomiting (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.45-0.67) relative to morphine. Subgroup analyses yielded RRs of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31-0.50), 0.54 (95% CI = 0.38-0.78), and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.68-0.95) for the 0.1 mg, 0.35 mg, and 0.5 mg groups, respectively. Moreover, oliceridine appeared to lower the incidence of opioid-related adverse events, including dizziness (RR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.76-1.04), dry mouth (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.37-0.69), pruritus (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.35-0.70), and somnolence (RR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.45-0.82). Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low. Conclusion: Oliceridine, particularly at 0.1-0.35 mg demand doses, reduces PONV and several opioid-related adverse events compared with morphine while maintaining effective analgesia. However, compared with placebo, typical opioid adverse effects remain. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024604703, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42024604703).

Frontiers in PharmacologyVol. 17
Jiangnan University (CN), Wuxi Fourth People's Hospital (CN), Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.