Defined-Outcome ETFs with a Convex Payoff Profile, Part II: The Downside-to-Upside Trade-Off

This article is the second in a two-part series introducing a new type of defined-outcome ETF with a convex payoff profile. These ETFs are designed to offer improved performance during significant market drawdowns and recoveries compared to existing defined-outcome ETFs with a concave payoff profile. In this article, we further analyze the downside-to-upside trade-off of convex and concave defined-outcome ETFs using the downside-to-upside performance ratio. Our historical analysis shows that both concave and convex defined-outcome ETFs exhibit similar downside-to-upside performance ratios. However, concave defined-outcome ETFs offer a superior trade-off during moderate market drawdowns and recoveries, while convex defined-outcome ETFs provide a better trade-off during deep market drawdowns and recoveries. These differences stem from their distinct payoff profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jbis.2026.005
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defined-Outcome ETFs with a Convex Payoff Profile, Part II: The Downside-to-Upside Trade-Off

Ding Liu
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Defined-Outcome ETFs with a Convex Payoff Profile, Part II: The Downside-to-Upside Trade-Off

Ding Liu
article en

Abstract

This article is the second in a two-part series introducing a new type of defined-outcome ETF with a convex payoff profile. These ETFs are designed to offer improved performance during significant market drawdowns and recoveries compared to existing defined-outcome ETFs with a concave payoff profile. In this article, we further analyze the downside-to-upside trade-off of convex and concave defined-outcome ETFs using the downside-to-upside performance ratio. Our historical analysis shows that both concave and convex defined-outcome ETFs exhibit similar downside-to-upside performance ratios. However, concave defined-outcome ETFs offer a superior trade-off during moderate market drawdowns and recoveries, while convex defined-outcome ETFs provide a better trade-off during deep market drawdowns and recoveries. These differences stem from their distinct payoff profiles.

The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies
Saint Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defined-Outcome ETFs with a Convex Payoff Profile, Part II: The Downside-to-Upside Trade-Off — Ding Liu · The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS