Technology selection in design education in an undergraduate course

A common issue when utilising maker technologies relates to the technology used in the prototyping phase. Few studies have explored the factors influencing students' technology selection in interactive prototyping, highlighting the need for further investigation. Our interview-based study involved undergraduate students using technologies to prototype interactivities at a design school. We analysed the students’ design works and discussions using the grounded theory framework. Results reveal that the electrical and communication properties of the components, as well as the socio-technical environment in which students learn, are important considerations when selecting components. Our results underscore the need for further research and the development of innovative boards and componentry for educational practitioners. • Constructing and programming interactive prototypes are challenging for designers. • This in-the-wild study explores how students choose appropriate technologies for building interactive artefact prototypes. • Social dynamics (e.g. tutor support and peer influence) override device technical inferiority in student decision making. • Connection and communication types critical for building interactive prototypes. • Identifying prototype components is based on socio-technical dynamics, electronics, and communication features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Design Studies
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2025.101344
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology selection in design education in an undergraduate course

Andrea Alessandrini
Design Studies
Design Education and Practice
article

Technology selection in design education in an undergraduate course

Andrea Alessandrini
article en

Abstract

A common issue when utilising maker technologies relates to the technology used in the prototyping phase. Few studies have explored the factors influencing students' technology selection in interactive prototyping, highlighting the need for further investigation. Our interview-based study involved undergraduate students using technologies to prototype interactivities at a design school. We analysed the students’ design works and discussions using the grounded theory framework. Results reveal that the electrical and communication properties of the components, as well as the socio-technical environment in which students learn, are important considerations when selecting components. Our results underscore the need for further research and the development of innovative boards and componentry for educational practitioners. • Constructing and programming interactive prototypes are challenging for designers. • This in-the-wild study explores how students choose appropriate technologies for building interactive artefact prototypes. • Social dynamics (e.g. tutor support and peer influence) override device technical inferiority in student decision making. • Connection and communication types critical for building interactive prototypes. • Identifying prototype components is based on socio-technical dynamics, electronics, and communication features.

Design StudiesVol. 104
University of Urbino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.