An international survey of the relatives and friends of electroconvulsive therapy recipients

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to address the paucity of studies of the relatives and friends of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) patients. METHODS: A total of 1144 people responded to an online survey. RESULTS: The respondents included 286 relatives and friends of ECT recipients, from 22 countries. 45% reported improvement in the problem for which ECT was prescribed, and 42% said it made the problem worse. 61% thought ECT had made 'overall quality of life' worse and 32% reported improvement. On three measures of memory, between 51% and 73% reported memory loss in their relative or friend (mostly lasting at least 3 years), and 8%-11% reported memory improvement. Twenty one of 25 other adverse effects from ECT were reported by 50% or more of the relatives/friends, including: Difficulty concentrating (79%), Fatigue (73%), Emotional blunting (73%), Loss of independence (72%) and Relationship problems (70%). 34% believed ECT had caused brain damage. When asked, 'Would you want to have ECT yourself, if a psychiatrist thought you needed it?' 72% said no. Two open questions, about impact on the patient and on the relative/friend, both elicited about three times as many negative impacts as positive ones. CONCLUSIONS: The responses of the relatives/friends are broadly similar to ECT recipients' responses to the same survey, reported elsewhere, which tends to support the accuracy of the ECT recipients' responses. ECT recipients and their families need a more detailed and accurate picture of possible benefits and harms if they are to give fully informed consent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.70062
Primary Topic
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An international survey of the relatives and friends of electroconvulsive therapy recipients

Sue Cunliffe, Sarah Price Hancock, Lucy Johnstone, John Read et al.
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
article

An international survey of the relatives and friends of electroconvulsive therapy recipients

Sue Cunliffe, Sarah Price Hancock, Lucy Johnstone, John Read, Lisa Morrison, Christopher Harrop
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to address the paucity of studies of the relatives and friends of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) patients. METHODS: A total of 1144 people responded to an online survey. RESULTS: The respondents included 286 relatives and friends of ECT recipients, from 22 countries. 45% reported improvement in the problem for which ECT was prescribed, and 42% said it made the problem worse. 61% thought ECT had made 'overall quality of life' worse and 32% reported improvement. On three measures of memory, between 51% and 73% reported memory loss in their relative or friend (mostly lasting at least 3 years), and 8%-11% reported memory improvement. Twenty one of 25 other adverse effects from ECT were reported by 50% or more of the relatives/friends, including: Difficulty concentrating (79%), Fatigue (73%), Emotional blunting (73%), Loss of independence (72%) and Relationship problems (70%). 34% believed ECT had caused brain damage. When asked, 'Would you want to have ECT yourself, if a psychiatrist thought you needed it?' 72% said no. Two open questions, about impact on the patient and on the relative/friend, both elicited about three times as many negative impacts as positive ones. CONCLUSIONS: The responses of the relatives/friends are broadly similar to ECT recipients' responses to the same survey, reported elsewhere, which tends to support the accuracy of the ECT recipients' responses. ECT recipients and their families need a more detailed and accurate picture of possible benefits and harms if they are to give fully informed consent.

Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
University of East London (GB), Film Independent (US), WWF-UK (GB), Oldham Council (GB), University of Worcester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.