Deconstructing deep imbalanced regression: a comprehensive review and experimental evaluation

Abstract In real-world applications, there is a fundamental problem: the data most critical to predict interesting events, anomalies, and high-stakes outliers are the rarest, while less interesting data is abundant. Although deep learning is deployed specifically for these difficult prediction tasks, data-driven models inevitably fail in underrepresented areas. This discrepancy between the empirical data- and the desired evaluation distribution is equivalent to a target distribution shift. The research field, termed Deep Imbalanced Regression (DIR), has emerged explicitly to address this challenge, which is particularly acute for continuous targets where most conventional classification-based methods are ill-suited. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive review of the DIR landscape, organized around a novel two-axis taxonomy that disentangles challenges along a Data Axis (target distribution shift, continuity, and density) and a Deep-Learning Axis (shared capacity, biased updates, and manifold distortion), where the latter captures a cascading failure mechanism through which deep models systematically neglect underrepresented targets. Within this framework, we systematically categorize and analyze 19 state-of-the-art methods spanning architectural, algorithm-level, and representation learning approaches, and empirically re-evaluate twelve of them with publicly available implementations under controlled, identical conditions. To stress-test generalization across the full target range, we introduce three novel targeted evaluation protocols, Balanced Extrapolation , Bimodal Interpolation , and Blind-Spot Isolation , that expose failure modes hidden by standard benchmarks ( https://github.com/noah-puetz/deconstructing_deep_imbalanced_regression ). Our study underscores the significant impact of imbalance on regression accuracy, offering a conceptual framework and practical benchmarks to catalyze further development of systems capable of capturing the rare as reliably as the common.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11570-1
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstructing deep imbalanced regression: a comprehensive review and experimental evaluation

Thomas Bartz–Beielstein, Jens Uwe Brandt, Elena Raponi, N. Pütz et al.
Artificial Intelligence Review
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Deconstructing deep imbalanced regression: a comprehensive review and experimental evaluation

Thomas Bartz–Beielstein, Jens Uwe Brandt, Elena Raponi, N. Pütz, Thomas Bäck, Marc Hilbert
article en

Abstract

Abstract In real-world applications, there is a fundamental problem: the data most critical to predict interesting events, anomalies, and high-stakes outliers are the rarest, while less interesting data is abundant. Although deep learning is deployed specifically for these difficult prediction tasks, data-driven models inevitably fail in underrepresented areas. This discrepancy between the empirical data- and the desired evaluation distribution is equivalent to a target distribution shift. The research field, termed Deep Imbalanced Regression (DIR), has emerged explicitly to address this challenge, which is particularly acute for continuous targets where most conventional classification-based methods are ill-suited. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive review of the DIR landscape, organized around a novel two-axis taxonomy that disentangles challenges along a Data Axis (target distribution shift, continuity, and density) and a Deep-Learning Axis (shared capacity, biased updates, and manifold distortion), where the latter captures a cascading failure mechanism through which deep models systematically neglect underrepresented targets. Within this framework, we systematically categorize and analyze 19 state-of-the-art methods spanning architectural, algorithm-level, and representation learning approaches, and empirically re-evaluate twelve of them with publicly available implementations under controlled, identical conditions. To stress-test generalization across the full target range, we introduce three novel targeted evaluation protocols, Balanced Extrapolation , Bimodal Interpolation , and Blind-Spot Isolation , that expose failure modes hidden by standard benchmarks ( https://github.com/noah-puetz/deconstructing_deep_imbalanced_regression ). Our study underscores the significant impact of imbalance on regression accuracy, offering a conceptual framework and practical benchmarks to catalyze further development of systems capable of capturing the rare as reliably as the common.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 59(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.