Validation of a mobile application for prehospital transport time data collection in Kigali, Rwanda

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) are critical for patient outcomes during emergencies. Organised EMS systems that can promptly locate patients, deliver on-scene care, and transport patients to appropriate facilities are lacking in low- and middle-income countries. Through a long-standing partnership with Rwanda's Service d'Aide Médicale d'Urgence (SAMU), we developed and implemented an electronic application to capture prehospital times in Kigali, Rwanda. This study validates the accuracy of electronically captured data and establishes baseline response times for emergencies in Kigali. METHODS: Prospective data on prehospital transport times in Kigali collected from July 2022 to December 2023 were captured using a novel electronic application custom-built by Rwanda Build program (RWB), a local software accelerator in Kigali. RWB data were compared to SAMU's manually collected data to validate the accuracy of the electronically captured data. Datasets were deterministically linked using patient identifications (ID). Cases with missing patient ID were probabilistically linked using RWB deploy time compared to the paper dataset's leave time. The primary outcome was total prehospital time, from ambulance deployment to healthcare facility arrival. Secondary outcomes included time intervals of deployment to scene, on scene, scene to healthcare facility, and handoff times. Additional analyses compared response times of subgroups captured by RWB, including emergency type, severity, and prehospital delays. RESULTS: After SAMU and RWB data linkage, 6209 patients were included. The primary outcome, total time of ambulance deployment to hospital arrival, took an average of 54.5 min (standard deviation (SD) = 22.2) with a 0.53-min difference between paper records and the electronically captured dataset. The 30-s difference suggests the newly implemented electronic collection system is consistent with data recorded manually on EMS run reports. Trauma represented the most common emergency (65.2%), with an average prehospital time of 52.2 min (SD = 21.4). "Severe" emergencies took an average of 20 min longer to reach hospitals than "mild" cases (p < 0.001). Transit delays and districts with fewer transports were also associated with longer prehospital times. CONCLUSIONS: EMS is critical to healthcare systems. This study validated an electronic data-collection system to improve EMS services in Rwanda. This is one of the first studies to document EMS quality benchmarks in a sub-Saharan African country.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Global and Public Health
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-026-00271-0
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a mobile application for prehospital transport time data collection in Kigali, Rwanda

Sudha Jayaraman, M. Watt, Andrea N. Davis, Jean Marie Uwitonze et al.
BMC Global and Public Health
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Validation of a mobile application for prehospital transport time data collection in Kigali, Rwanda

Sudha Jayaraman, M. Watt, Andrea N. Davis, Jean Marie Uwitonze, J Davies, Jean Nepomuscene Sindikubwabo, Michael Oravic, Jeanne d’Arc Nyinawankusi, Teresa Bell, Rebecca Maine, Menelas Nkeshimana, Robert Rickard
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) are critical for patient outcomes during emergencies. Organised EMS systems that can promptly locate patients, deliver on-scene care, and transport patients to appropriate facilities are lacking in low- and middle-income countries. Through a long-standing partnership with Rwanda's Service d'Aide Médicale d'Urgence (SAMU), we developed and implemented an electronic application to capture prehospital times in Kigali, Rwanda. This study validates the accuracy of electronically captured data and establishes baseline response times for emergencies in Kigali. METHODS: Prospective data on prehospital transport times in Kigali collected from July 2022 to December 2023 were captured using a novel electronic application custom-built by Rwanda Build program (RWB), a local software accelerator in Kigali. RWB data were compared to SAMU's manually collected data to validate the accuracy of the electronically captured data. Datasets were deterministically linked using patient identifications (ID). Cases with missing patient ID were probabilistically linked using RWB deploy time compared to the paper dataset's leave time. The primary outcome was total prehospital time, from ambulance deployment to healthcare facility arrival. Secondary outcomes included time intervals of deployment to scene, on scene, scene to healthcare facility, and handoff times. Additional analyses compared response times of subgroups captured by RWB, including emergency type, severity, and prehospital delays. RESULTS: After SAMU and RWB data linkage, 6209 patients were included. The primary outcome, total time of ambulance deployment to hospital arrival, took an average of 54.5 min (standard deviation (SD) = 22.2) with a 0.53-min difference between paper records and the electronically captured dataset. The 30-s difference suggests the newly implemented electronic collection system is consistent with data recorded manually on EMS run reports. Trauma represented the most common emergency (65.2%), with an average prehospital time of 52.2 min (SD = 21.4). "Severe" emergencies took an average of 20 min longer to reach hospitals than "mild" cases (p < 0.001). Transit delays and districts with fewer transports were also associated with longer prehospital times. CONCLUSIONS: EMS is critical to healthcare systems. This study validated an electronic data-collection system to improve EMS services in Rwanda. This is one of the first studies to document EMS quality benchmarks in a sub-Saharan African country.

BMC Global and Public HealthVol. 4(1)
University of Washington (US), University of Utah (US), University of Rwanda (RW), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW), Ministry of Infrastructure (RW), Ministry of Health (RW), Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, National Institutes of Health
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.