Glucose and Loss of Control Eating: Evidence From Naturalistic Assessment After Roux‐en‐Y Gastric Bypass

OBJECTIVE: While loss of control (LOC) eating is associated with poor outcomes following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), the mechanisms driving it are less understood. This study used momentary, naturalistic data to examine glucose as a biological correlate of LOC eating after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHOD: Participants (45 adults one-year post-RYGB) completed 10 days of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) while wearing a continuous glucose monitor (CGM). Eating episodes reported in EMA were time-matched to CGM readings 3 hours before and after eating episodes. Four CGM metrics (mean, variability, time in hyper- and hypo-glycaemia) were used in multilevel models to test whether glucose functioning was a significant antecedent and/or consequence of LOC eating. RESULTS: Greater mean glucose levels and variability each significantly predicted engagement in an eating episode, while more time spent in hyperglycemia predicted the absence of eating. Significantly higher mean glucose was observed after eating. No glucose metric specifically predicted engagement in LOC eating; however, LOC eating resulted in significantly greater glucose variability. CONCLUSIONS: Glucose level and variability predicted subsequent eating, but not LOC eating. However, LOC eating was associated with subsequent glucose variability, which might help explain how LOC eating is associated with poorer outcomes following RYGB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Eating Disorders Review
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70102
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glucose and Loss of Control Eating: Evidence From Naturalistic Assessment After Roux‐en‐Y Gastric Bypass

Glen Forester, David B. Sarwer, Kristine J. Steffen, Stephen A. Wonderlich et al.
European Eating Disorders Review
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Glucose and Loss of Control Eating: Evidence From Naturalistic Assessment After Roux‐en‐Y Gastric Bypass

Glen Forester, David B. Sarwer, Kristine J. Steffen, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Gail A. Williams‐Kerver, Debra L. Safer, Scott G. Engel
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While loss of control (LOC) eating is associated with poor outcomes following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), the mechanisms driving it are less understood. This study used momentary, naturalistic data to examine glucose as a biological correlate of LOC eating after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHOD: Participants (45 adults one-year post-RYGB) completed 10 days of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) while wearing a continuous glucose monitor (CGM). Eating episodes reported in EMA were time-matched to CGM readings 3 hours before and after eating episodes. Four CGM metrics (mean, variability, time in hyper- and hypo-glycaemia) were used in multilevel models to test whether glucose functioning was a significant antecedent and/or consequence of LOC eating. RESULTS: Greater mean glucose levels and variability each significantly predicted engagement in an eating episode, while more time spent in hyperglycemia predicted the absence of eating. Significantly higher mean glucose was observed after eating. No glucose metric specifically predicted engagement in LOC eating; however, LOC eating resulted in significantly greater glucose variability. CONCLUSIONS: Glucose level and variability predicted subsequent eating, but not LOC eating. However, LOC eating was associated with subsequent glucose variability, which might help explain how LOC eating is associated with poorer outcomes following RYGB.

European Eating Disorders Review
University of North Dakota (US), Sanford Research (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), North Dakota State University (US), Temple University (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.