Peptide-to-Protein Data Aggregation Using Fisher’s Method Improves Target Identification in Chemical Proteomics

Protein-level statistical tests in proteomics, aimed at obtaining p-values, are conventionally made on protein abundances aggregated from peptide data. This integral approach overlooks peptide-level heterogeneity and ignores important information coded in individual peptide data, while protein p-values can also be obtained by Fisher's method of combining peptide p-values using chi-square statistics. Here, we test this latter approach across diverse chemical proteomics data sets based on assessments of protein expression, solubility, and protease accessibility. Using the top four peptides ranked by their p-values consistently outperformed protein-level analysis and avoided biases introduced by the inclusion of deviant peptides or the imputation of missing peptide values. Fisher's method provides a simple and robust strategy, improving identification of regulated/shifted proteins in diverse proteomics assays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c08021
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peptide-to-Protein Data Aggregation Using Fisher’s Method Improves Target Identification in Chemical Proteomics

Susanna Lundström, Roman A. Zubarev, Zhaowei Meng, Hezheng Lyu et al.
Analytical Chemistry
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Peptide-to-Protein Data Aggregation Using Fisher’s Method Improves Target Identification in Chemical Proteomics

Susanna Lundström, Roman A. Zubarev, Zhaowei Meng, Hezheng Lyu, Hassan Gharibi, Bohdana Sokolova, Xuepei Zhang
article en

Abstract

Protein-level statistical tests in proteomics, aimed at obtaining p-values, are conventionally made on protein abundances aggregated from peptide data. This integral approach overlooks peptide-level heterogeneity and ignores important information coded in individual peptide data, while protein p-values can also be obtained by Fisher's method of combining peptide p-values using chi-square statistics. Here, we test this latter approach across diverse chemical proteomics data sets based on assessments of protein expression, solubility, and protease accessibility. Using the top four peptides ranked by their p-values consistently outperformed protein-level analysis and avoided biases introduced by the inclusion of deviant peptides or the imputation of missing peptide values. Fisher's method provides a simple and robust strategy, improving identification of regulated/shifted proteins in diverse proteomics assays.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 98(17)
Sechenov University (RU), Science for Life Laboratory (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Abterra Biosciences (United States) (US), Department of Physiological Sciences (RU), Leitat Technological Center (ES), Biomotif (Sweden) (SE)
European Commission, Cancerfonden, Vetenskapsrådet, RUDN University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.