The TNA Framework: Complete Foundations for Axiomatic Structuralism

This monograph integrates a decade of research into the TNA Framework, a unified theory of Axiomatic Structuralism. The central thesis posits that no coherent system—be it logical, physical, or conscious—can fully justify its own conditions of coherence; instead, every system requires an external structural anchor, defined as the latent domain $N_1$, which cannot be derived from within the observable domain $N_0$. We formalize the Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), demonstrating that a minimal core of non-derivable axioms is essential for systemic stability. This framework is applied to resolve fundamental paradoxes: in quantum mechanics, wave-function collapse is reinterpreted as a boundary-induced phase transition; in dynamics, randomness is revealed as the macroscopic manifestation of unresolved structural multiplicity in non-Lipschitz regimes. Furthermore, we define consciousness as a persistent, self-reinforcing bridge between the semantic ($N_1$) and logical ($N_0$) levels. By shifting from post-materialist narratives to a formal focus on structural limits, TNA provides a robust methodology for understanding the necessity of external constraints in the evolution of complex systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19701389
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The TNA Framework: Complete Foundations for Axiomatic Structuralism

Claudio Bresciano
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

The TNA Framework: Complete Foundations for Axiomatic Structuralism

Claudio Bresciano
article en

Abstract

This monograph integrates a decade of research into the TNA Framework, a unified theory of Axiomatic Structuralism. The central thesis posits that no coherent system—be it logical, physical, or conscious—can fully justify its own conditions of coherence; instead, every system requires an external structural anchor, defined as the latent domain $N_1$, which cannot be derived from within the observable domain $N_0$. We formalize the Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), demonstrating that a minimal core of non-derivable axioms is essential for systemic stability. This framework is applied to resolve fundamental paradoxes: in quantum mechanics, wave-function collapse is reinterpreted as a boundary-induced phase transition; in dynamics, randomness is revealed as the macroscopic manifestation of unresolved structural multiplicity in non-Lipschitz regimes. Furthermore, we define consciousness as a persistent, self-reinforcing bridge between the semantic ($N_1$) and logical ($N_0$) levels. By shifting from post-materialist narratives to a formal focus on structural limits, TNA provides a robust methodology for understanding the necessity of external constraints in the evolution of complex systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The TNA Framework: Complete Foundations for Axiomatic Structuralism — Claudio Bresciano · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS