Universal Language and Universal Prose: Eugene Jolas, H. G. Wells, and the Languages of Modernist Utopianism

Focusing on H. G. Wells and Eugene Jolas, this article provides an account of how interwar plans for an international language linked literary experimentalism with utopian political ambitions. Following the First World War, efforts to establish an international or universal language such as Esperanto enjoyed the height of their popularity. Advocates for universal languages homed in on literature as an ideal testing ground for the refinement and propagation of their languages, while writers like Wells and Jolas responded by considering how literature might inaugurate a new idiom that corrected the defects of Esperanto and other artificial languages. Reading Wells’s The Bulpington of Blup (1933) as a satire of the avant-garde experiments in Jolas’s transition, I consider how Wells’s and Jolas’s differing utopian ambitions led them to value different kinds of literary experiments with language. By returning to international language debates of the interwar period, before the arrival of global English was a certainty, the article recovers an unfamiliar history of the utopian character of interwar literature. Linguistic utopians like Wells and Jolas imagined a direct path between literary and social form because they believed the social forms of the coming global utopia stood to benefit from the correct literary refinements and fusions of language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Philology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/740485
Primary Topic
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Universal Language and Universal Prose: Eugene Jolas, H. G. Wells, and the Languages of Modernist Utopianism

Jonah Shallit
Modern Philology
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
article

Universal Language and Universal Prose: Eugene Jolas, H. G. Wells, and the Languages of Modernist Utopianism

Jonah Shallit
article en

Abstract

Focusing on H. G. Wells and Eugene Jolas, this article provides an account of how interwar plans for an international language linked literary experimentalism with utopian political ambitions. Following the First World War, efforts to establish an international or universal language such as Esperanto enjoyed the height of their popularity. Advocates for universal languages homed in on literature as an ideal testing ground for the refinement and propagation of their languages, while writers like Wells and Jolas responded by considering how literature might inaugurate a new idiom that corrected the defects of Esperanto and other artificial languages. Reading Wells’s The Bulpington of Blup (1933) as a satire of the avant-garde experiments in Jolas’s transition, I consider how Wells’s and Jolas’s differing utopian ambitions led them to value different kinds of literary experiments with language. By returning to international language debates of the interwar period, before the arrival of global English was a certainty, the article recovers an unfamiliar history of the utopian character of interwar literature. Linguistic utopians like Wells and Jolas imagined a direct path between literary and social form because they believed the social forms of the coming global utopia stood to benefit from the correct literary refinements and fusions of language.

Modern PhilologyVol. 123(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.