A comparative study of Korean and Russian language textbooks for the grammar instruction of Koryoin immigrant students

This study compares grammar items in Korean language textbooks and Russian language textbooks used in the learners’ home-country schooling in order to support grammar learning among Koryoin immigrant students. While both textbook sets pursue a continuous progression in grammar instruction, they differ in their orientations and instructional focus: Korean language textbooks adopt a meaning- and function-oriented approach, presenting grammar in relation to literacy development and language use contexts, whereas Russian language textbooks emphasize a form- and structure-oriented approach, organizing grammar around the systematic acquisition of rules and forms. Based on this analysis, the following pedagogical implications are suggested. First, learners’ L1 grammatical knowledge can be used as instructional resources. Second, explicit cross-linguistic comparison can address structural differences between the two languages. Third, context-sensitive grammar instruction and teacher supports such as cross-linguistic correspondence tables, and brief diagnostic tools are needed for effective classroom implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2026.03.116.71
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of Korean and Russian language textbooks for the grammar instruction of Koryoin immigrant students

Hyojung Kim
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

A comparative study of Korean and Russian language textbooks for the grammar instruction of Koryoin immigrant students

Hyojung Kim
article en

Abstract

This study compares grammar items in Korean language textbooks and Russian language textbooks used in the learners’ home-country schooling in order to support grammar learning among Koryoin immigrant students. While both textbook sets pursue a continuous progression in grammar instruction, they differ in their orientations and instructional focus: Korean language textbooks adopt a meaning- and function-oriented approach, presenting grammar in relation to literacy development and language use contexts, whereas Russian language textbooks emphasize a form- and structure-oriented approach, organizing grammar around the systematic acquisition of rules and forms. Based on this analysis, the following pedagogical implications are suggested. First, learners’ L1 grammatical knowledge can be used as instructional resources. Second, explicit cross-linguistic comparison can address structural differences between the two languages. Third, context-sensitive grammar instruction and teacher supports such as cross-linguistic correspondence tables, and brief diagnostic tools are needed for effective classroom implementation.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 116
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.