The Telemedicine Paradox: Why Data Moves but Care Does Not

While digital health technologies have rendered national borders technically obsolete, the European Union's (EU) legal framework for cross-border telemedicine remains fragmented. This paper examines the tension between the EU's internal market logic - favouring the free movement of services - and the Member States' protected competence over health system organisation under Article 168(7) TFEU. By analysing the limitations of the 2011 Patients' Rights Directive, the study evaluates whether the recent European Health Data Space (EHDS) Regulation and the broader European Health Union can provide a coherent regulatory foundation for digital mobility in the context of cross-border telemedicine. This will be done by relying on two primary legal frictions: professional licensing and reimbursement mechanisms. The paper argues that for the EHDS Regulation to succeed, it must move beyond technical interoperability to address the underlying legal-ethical conflicts of digital sovereignty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Health Law
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10171
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Telemedicine Paradox: Why Data Moves but Care Does Not

Wendy Kwaku Yeboah
European Journal of Health Law
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

The Telemedicine Paradox: Why Data Moves but Care Does Not

Wendy Kwaku Yeboah
article en

Abstract

While digital health technologies have rendered national borders technically obsolete, the European Union's (EU) legal framework for cross-border telemedicine remains fragmented. This paper examines the tension between the EU's internal market logic - favouring the free movement of services - and the Member States' protected competence over health system organisation under Article 168(7) TFEU. By analysing the limitations of the 2011 Patients' Rights Directive, the study evaluates whether the recent European Health Data Space (EHDS) Regulation and the broader European Health Union can provide a coherent regulatory foundation for digital mobility in the context of cross-border telemedicine. This will be done by relying on two primary legal frictions: professional licensing and reimbursement mechanisms. The paper argues that for the EHDS Regulation to succeed, it must move beyond technical interoperability to address the underlying legal-ethical conflicts of digital sovereignty.

European Journal of Health LawVol. 33(2)
University of Bologna (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Telemedicine Paradox: Why Data Moves but Care Does Not — Wendy Kwaku Yeboah · European Journal of Health Law (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS