Speed Accuracy Trade‐Off in Implicit and Explicit Emotion Recognition in Alexithymia

ABSTRACT Alexithymia is linked to emotion‐recognition difficulties, yet effects vary by processing level and trait facets. We assessed speed and accuracy for implicit and explicit emotion recognition across visual, auditory, and cross‐modal tasks. Adults ( N = 155) completed the Hindi adaptation of TAS‐20 (TAS‐20‐H) and six emotion recognition tasks: four unimodal (implicit/explicit × visual/auditory) and two cross‐modal implicit (visual–auditory; auditory–visual). Implicit tasks required speeded matching; explicit tasks required speeded labelling. Higher alexithymia, particularly difficulty identifying and describing feelings , predicted slower responses without accuracy loss on explicit tasks, indicating a speed–accuracy shift. In contrast, while on implicit tasks higher alexithymia was associated with reduced accuracy without significant slowing, on the visual implicit task it was associated with reductions in both speed and accuracy. Cross‐modally, accuracy reductions were specific to auditory targets matched to visual cues. An emotion‐recognition ability composite correlated negatively with alexithymia. Findings indicate a processing‐level dissociation (explicit: slower; implicit: less accurate) and highlight the value of analysing decision dynamics and modality, with implications for multimodal, appraisal‐focussed training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70207
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speed Accuracy Trade‐Off in Implicit and Explicit Emotion Recognition in Alexithymia

Dr R Pandey, Meenakshi Shukla
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Speed Accuracy Trade‐Off in Implicit and Explicit Emotion Recognition in Alexithymia

Dr R Pandey, Meenakshi Shukla
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Alexithymia is linked to emotion‐recognition difficulties, yet effects vary by processing level and trait facets. We assessed speed and accuracy for implicit and explicit emotion recognition across visual, auditory, and cross‐modal tasks. Adults ( N = 155) completed the Hindi adaptation of TAS‐20 (TAS‐20‐H) and six emotion recognition tasks: four unimodal (implicit/explicit × visual/auditory) and two cross‐modal implicit (visual–auditory; auditory–visual). Implicit tasks required speeded matching; explicit tasks required speeded labelling. Higher alexithymia, particularly difficulty identifying and describing feelings , predicted slower responses without accuracy loss on explicit tasks, indicating a speed–accuracy shift. In contrast, while on implicit tasks higher alexithymia was associated with reduced accuracy without significant slowing, on the visual implicit task it was associated with reductions in both speed and accuracy. Cross‐modally, accuracy reductions were specific to auditory targets matched to visual cues. An emotion‐recognition ability composite correlated negatively with alexithymia. Findings indicate a processing‐level dissociation (explicit: slower; implicit: less accurate) and highlight the value of analysing decision dynamics and modality, with implications for multimodal, appraisal‐focussed training.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(3)
University of Allahabad (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.