JUSTICE AFTER WAR IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH: A STUDY OF JUS POST BELLUM PRINCIPLES

This study aims to analyze the new political and legal dynamics emerging after the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, focusing on the principles of jus post bellum (justice after war), the third component of the just war doctrine, within the context of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia. The study, based on document analysis, a qualitative research method, examines the ethical, legal, and institutional dimensions of the post-conflict period, exploring the applicability of justice after war in the Nagorno-Karabakh context. It analyzes the principles of accountability, reconciliation, reconstruction, restitution, reparation, and proportionality, considering their practical applications in the region. Key issues such as the investigation of war crimes, confidence-building measures, mine clearance, infrastructure projects, the return of displaced persons, the restoration of cultural heritage, and border demarcation are also assessed. The study demonstrates that post-war justice can be achieved not only through the cessation of armed conflict but also through legal, ethical, and institutional transformation. A peace treaty drafted solely based on the demands of the winning side will not guarantee a just and lasting peace. The permanence of peace in conflict zones is only possible through a peace treaty that takes into account the demands of all parties and is written fairly. Otherwise, the ceasefire achieved now will likely lead to a return to armed conflict later. The study argues that lasting peace in Nagorno-Karabakh is achievable not only through the cessation of armed conflict but also through the implementation of jus post bellum principles.