Comparison of balance, proprioception, and fear of falling in older adults with and without a compensatory dynamic knee valgus

Compensatory movement patterns in older adults may reflect biomechanical abnormalities and sensorimotor system impairments, which can increase the risk of falls. This study aimed to compare static and dynamic balance, knee proprioception, and fear of falling in older men with and without a dynamic knee valgus. This causal-comparative study included 60 older men aged 60–70 years from Urmia, Iran. Participants were divided into two groups (n = 30 each) with and without a dynamic knee valgus, determined through observational assessment of knee alignment during a squat task. Static balance was evaluated using the Sharpened Romberg test, dynamic balance using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, knee proprioception using a photogrammetry-based method, and fear of falling using the Falls Efficacy Scale–International (FES-I). Data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests with a significance level set at 0.05. Participants with a dynamic knee valgus demonstrated significantly poorer performance in all measured variables, including static balance (with eyes open and closed), dynamic balance (TUG), knee proprioception, and fear of falling, compared with those without knee valgus (p < 0.001). A dynamic knee valgus may serve as a clinical may be associated with impaired balance and sensorimotor function in older adults. Early identification of this pattern during screening assessments may be associated with fall-related risk factors and inform the design of targeted sensorimotor corrective interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09883-x
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of balance, proprioception, and fear of falling in older adults with and without a compensatory dynamic knee valgus

Sajad Roshani, Youssef Mohammad Rahim Al-Saadi
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Comparison of balance, proprioception, and fear of falling in older adults with and without a compensatory dynamic knee valgus

Sajad Roshani, Youssef Mohammad Rahim Al-Saadi
article en

Abstract

Compensatory movement patterns in older adults may reflect biomechanical abnormalities and sensorimotor system impairments, which can increase the risk of falls. This study aimed to compare static and dynamic balance, knee proprioception, and fear of falling in older men with and without a dynamic knee valgus. This causal-comparative study included 60 older men aged 60–70 years from Urmia, Iran. Participants were divided into two groups (n = 30 each) with and without a dynamic knee valgus, determined through observational assessment of knee alignment during a squat task. Static balance was evaluated using the Sharpened Romberg test, dynamic balance using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, knee proprioception using a photogrammetry-based method, and fear of falling using the Falls Efficacy Scale–International (FES-I). Data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests with a significance level set at 0.05. Participants with a dynamic knee valgus demonstrated significantly poorer performance in all measured variables, including static balance (with eyes open and closed), dynamic balance (TUG), knee proprioception, and fear of falling, compared with those without knee valgus (p < 0.001). A dynamic knee valgus may serve as a clinical may be associated with impaired balance and sensorimotor function in older adults. Early identification of this pattern during screening assessments may be associated with fall-related risk factors and inform the design of targeted sensorimotor corrective interventions.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Urmia University (IR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.