Second-Life EV Batteries in Stationary Storage: Techno-Economic and Environmental Benchmarking vs. Pb-Acid and H2

Stationary energy storage (SES) is increasingly needed to integrate variable renewable generation and improve consumer self-consumption, but technology choices involve associated trade-offs between cost, efficiency, and life-cycle impacts. This study evaluates the role of second-life lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries repurposed from electric vehicles for stationary applications, compared to lead-acid (Pb-acid) batteries and power-to-hydrogen-to-power (PtH2P) systems. We develop an optimization-based sizing and dispatch framework using measured PV–load profiles and hourly market electricity prices, and evaluate performance per 1 MWh delivered to the load over a 10-year life cycle. Economic performance is quantified through discounted cash flows equal to levelized cost of storage (LCOS), while environmental performance is assessed through life-cycle metrics with explicit representation of recycling and second-life credits. In addition to global warming potential (GWP), the analysis considers additional resource and impact metrics, as well as key operational efficiency metrics, including bidirectional consumption efficiency, autonomy, and share of self-consumption/export of photovoltaic systems. Scenario and sensitivity analyses examine the impact of policy and financial parameters, in particular feed-in tariff remuneration and discount rate, on the comparative ranking of technologies. The results highlight how circular economy pathways, especially second-life distribution for Li-ion batteries and high end-of-life recovery for lead-acid batteries, have a significant impact on the life-cycle burden for delivered energy, while market-driven conditions for dispatching and export activities shape economic outcomes. Overall, the proposed workflow provides a transparent, circularity-aware basis for selecting stationary storage technologies associated with photovoltaic systems, under realistic operational constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092026
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Second-Life EV Batteries in Stationary Storage: Techno-Economic and Environmental Benchmarking vs. Pb-Acid and H2

Plamen Antonov Stanchev, Nikolay Hinov
Energies
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Second-Life EV Batteries in Stationary Storage: Techno-Economic and Environmental Benchmarking vs. Pb-Acid and H2

Plamen Antonov Stanchev, Nikolay Hinov
article en

Abstract

Stationary energy storage (SES) is increasingly needed to integrate variable renewable generation and improve consumer self-consumption, but technology choices involve associated trade-offs between cost, efficiency, and life-cycle impacts. This study evaluates the role of second-life lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries repurposed from electric vehicles for stationary applications, compared to lead-acid (Pb-acid) batteries and power-to-hydrogen-to-power (PtH2P) systems. We develop an optimization-based sizing and dispatch framework using measured PV–load profiles and hourly market electricity prices, and evaluate performance per 1 MWh delivered to the load over a 10-year life cycle. Economic performance is quantified through discounted cash flows equal to levelized cost of storage (LCOS), while environmental performance is assessed through life-cycle metrics with explicit representation of recycling and second-life credits. In addition to global warming potential (GWP), the analysis considers additional resource and impact metrics, as well as key operational efficiency metrics, including bidirectional consumption efficiency, autonomy, and share of self-consumption/export of photovoltaic systems. Scenario and sensitivity analyses examine the impact of policy and financial parameters, in particular feed-in tariff remuneration and discount rate, on the comparative ranking of technologies. The results highlight how circular economy pathways, especially second-life distribution for Li-ion batteries and high end-of-life recovery for lead-acid batteries, have a significant impact on the life-cycle burden for delivered energy, while market-driven conditions for dispatching and export activities shape economic outcomes. Overall, the proposed workflow provides a transparent, circularity-aware basis for selecting stationary storage technologies associated with photovoltaic systems, under realistic operational constraints.

EnergiesVol. 19(9)
Technical University of Sofia (BG), Institute of Information and Communication Technologies (BG)
European Regional Development Fund
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.