Psychometric Properties of Digital Divide Measurement Instruments in Health Contexts: Systematic Review

Background: The digital divide constitutes a growing form of social inequality, influencing access to, use of, and benefit from digital health technologies. Accurate assessment of this phenomenon requires psychometrically sound measurement instruments, especially in health care contexts. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments developed to measure the digital divide, with a particular focus on their application in health-related settings. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 and COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Dialnet, and Web of Science for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Inclusion criteria required studies to report a psychometric evaluation of instruments measuring the digital divide. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria (ranging from 875 to 1337 participants). The identified scales primarily measured digital skills and capital. All studies reported adequate internal consistency, with Cronbach α coefficients ranging from 0.70 to 0.94. Structural validity was confirmed through factor analysis in all studies. However, data on temporal stability and responsiveness were absent. Conclusions: Existing instruments show potential for assessing digital inequality in health, but further psychometric validation and cultural adaptation are required. Nursing professionals are encouraged to lead efforts in developing and validating context-sensitive instruments to promote digital health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Human Factors
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/82005
Primary Topic
ICT Impact and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Properties of Digital Divide Measurement Instruments in Health Contexts: Systematic Review

Jesús Martínez-Tofé, Elena Chover‐Sierra, Noelia Navas-Echazarreta, Raúl Juárez-Vela et al.
JMIR Human Factors
ICT Impact and Policies
article

Psychometric Properties of Digital Divide Measurement Instruments in Health Contexts: Systematic Review

Jesús Martínez-Tofé, Elena Chover‐Sierra, Noelia Navas-Echazarreta, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Raquel María Martínez-Pascual, César Rubio-Tarazón, Antonio Martínez-Sabater, Pablo Del Pozo-Herce
article en

Abstract

Background: The digital divide constitutes a growing form of social inequality, influencing access to, use of, and benefit from digital health technologies. Accurate assessment of this phenomenon requires psychometrically sound measurement instruments, especially in health care contexts. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments developed to measure the digital divide, with a particular focus on their application in health-related settings. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 and COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Dialnet, and Web of Science for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Inclusion criteria required studies to report a psychometric evaluation of instruments measuring the digital divide. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria (ranging from 875 to 1337 participants). The identified scales primarily measured digital skills and capital. All studies reported adequate internal consistency, with Cronbach α coefficients ranging from 0.70 to 0.94. Structural validity was confirmed through factor analysis in all studies. However, data on temporal stability and responsiveness were absent. Conclusions: Existing instruments show potential for assessing digital inequality in health, but further psychometric validation and cultural adaptation are required. Nursing professionals are encouraged to lead efforts in developing and validating context-sensitive instruments to promote digital health equity.

JMIR Human FactorsVol. 13
Universidad de La Rioja (ES), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), Valencian International University (ES), Hospital General Universitario De Valencia (ES), INCLIVA Health Research Institute (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
ICT Impact and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.