Real-world performance of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: experience from the BrazilRetNet multicenter study. Report 1

To investigate real-world use of faricimab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). In this first analysis of the BrazilRetNet study group, we performed a multicenter, retrospective chart review of patients who completed the first three intravitreal injections of faricimab until October 2025; patients were followed in 15 retinal centers across Brazil. Collected data included clinical and demographic information, treatment strategy and history; main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) converted in ETDRS, macular central subfield thickness (CST) measured on optical coherence tomography (OCT), and adverse events. For comparison among baseline and follow-up variables, Wilcoxon test was employed; p values ≦ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 220 patients’ eyes were included. 145 eyes of 127 nAMD patients (56% women, average 78.6 ± 9.4 years-old, 94.5% caucasian) and 75 eyes of 54 DME patients (63% men, average 66.6 ± 10.9 years old, 83.3% caucasian). Prior intravitreal treatment was reported in 123 eyes (84.8%) with nAMD and 60 eyes (80%) with DME, with a mean of 16.8 and 11.7 previous injections, respectively. Baseline mean BCVA was 57.09 (nAMD) and 63.54 (DME). After three injections, mean BCVA improved to 61.06 for nAMD (p < 0.001; average gain of 3.97 letters) and 70.27 for DME (p < 0.001; average gain of 6.73 ETDRS letters). Baseline mean CST was 320.4 μm (nAMD) and 380.4 μm (DME), decreased to 264.3 μm (nAMD; p < 0.001; − 56.1 μm) and 312.7 μm (DME; p < 0.001; − 67.7 μm). Differences on BCVA and CST remained statistically significant when subgroups of naive or previously treated eyes were analyzed. All reported adverse events occurred in nAMD patients and included submacular hemorrhage (2 eyes), RPE tear (1 eye) and increased intraocular pressure (1 eye). No intraocular inflammation was reported. Overall, nAMD and DME patients treated with faricimab in this Brazilian cohort, presented BCVA improvement and a decreased CST after three injections. A low incidence of adverse events was reported, mostly associated to the natural history of the disease. Future analyses will provide further information on real-world farcimab treatment for nAMD and DME in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00860-z
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world performance of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: experience from the BrazilRetNet multicenter study. Report 1

Luiz Roisman, Wener Cella, Daniel Lavinsky, Fernando M. Penha et al.
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Real-world performance of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: experience from the BrazilRetNet multicenter study. Report 1

Luiz Roisman, Wener Cella, Daniel Lavinsky, Fernando M. Penha, Fernando K. Malerbi, Carlos Augusto Moreira-Neto, Leandro C. Zacharias, Carlos Eduardo D. Veloso, Gabriel C. Andrade, Danilo S. Soriano, Ana L. Peixoto, Francisco M. Damico, Giovanna S. Nutels, Francyne V. Cyrino, Vinicius Kniggendorf, Oswaldo F. Brasil, Renata F. Sugai, Caio V. Regatieri, Francisco Stefanini, Thiago C. Silveira, Marcio B. Nehemy, Vitor D. M. Costa, Joao Victor C. Miranda, Arnaldo Bordon, Cleide G. Machado
article en

Abstract

To investigate real-world use of faricimab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). In this first analysis of the BrazilRetNet study group, we performed a multicenter, retrospective chart review of patients who completed the first three intravitreal injections of faricimab until October 2025; patients were followed in 15 retinal centers across Brazil. Collected data included clinical and demographic information, treatment strategy and history; main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) converted in ETDRS, macular central subfield thickness (CST) measured on optical coherence tomography (OCT), and adverse events. For comparison among baseline and follow-up variables, Wilcoxon test was employed; p values ≦ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 220 patients’ eyes were included. 145 eyes of 127 nAMD patients (56% women, average 78.6 ± 9.4 years-old, 94.5% caucasian) and 75 eyes of 54 DME patients (63% men, average 66.6 ± 10.9 years old, 83.3% caucasian). Prior intravitreal treatment was reported in 123 eyes (84.8%) with nAMD and 60 eyes (80%) with DME, with a mean of 16.8 and 11.7 previous injections, respectively. Baseline mean BCVA was 57.09 (nAMD) and 63.54 (DME). After three injections, mean BCVA improved to 61.06 for nAMD (p < 0.001; average gain of 3.97 letters) and 70.27 for DME (p < 0.001; average gain of 6.73 ETDRS letters). Baseline mean CST was 320.4 μm (nAMD) and 380.4 μm (DME), decreased to 264.3 μm (nAMD; p < 0.001; − 56.1 μm) and 312.7 μm (DME; p < 0.001; − 67.7 μm). Differences on BCVA and CST remained statistically significant when subgroups of naive or previously treated eyes were analyzed. All reported adverse events occurred in nAMD patients and included submacular hemorrhage (2 eyes), RPE tear (1 eye) and increased intraocular pressure (1 eye). No intraocular inflammation was reported. Overall, nAMD and DME patients treated with faricimab in this Brazilian cohort, presented BCVA improvement and a decreased CST after three injections. A low incidence of adverse events was reported, mostly associated to the natural history of the disease. Future analyses will provide further information on real-world farcimab treatment for nAMD and DME in Brazil.

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), University of Cruz Alta (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), D’Or Institute for Research and Education (BR), Universidade Regional de Blumenau (BR), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (BR), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (BR), Universidade de Sorocaba (BR), Ministério da Saúde (BR), Grupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte (BR), Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (BR), Hospital Oftalmologico de Brasília (BR), Instituto Brasileiro de Museus (BR), Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Centro Universitário Paulistano (BR), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.