Five Decades of Research on Rape Myths and Victim Interpretation

Over the past 5 decades of social science research, scholars have examined false narratives and beliefs associated with rape and sexual assault (often called "rape myths"). This scoping review employs an innovative technique to sample and describe a large cohort of scholarly articles that investigate sexual assault victim interpretation and rape myths between the years 1973 and 2025. We describe how the field has gone through innovations such as the development of rape myth measurement scales, experimental and field research designs, an increasing emphasis on rape myths in legal contexts, and a broadening exploration of the types of victims affected by rape myths. We discuss trends such as the association between gender and rape myths, and common theoretical explanations for their persistence. We further highlight current gaps in the literature and offer areas where future research can expand current knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70060
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five Decades of Research on Rape Myths and Victim Interpretation

Elizabeth Trudeau, Ruth Carmi
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Five Decades of Research on Rape Myths and Victim Interpretation

Elizabeth Trudeau, Ruth Carmi
article en

Abstract

Over the past 5 decades of social science research, scholars have examined false narratives and beliefs associated with rape and sexual assault (often called "rape myths"). This scoping review employs an innovative technique to sample and describe a large cohort of scholarly articles that investigate sexual assault victim interpretation and rape myths between the years 1973 and 2025. We describe how the field has gone through innovations such as the development of rape myth measurement scales, experimental and field research designs, an increasing emphasis on rape myths in legal contexts, and a broadening exploration of the types of victims affected by rape myths. We discuss trends such as the association between gender and rape myths, and common theoretical explanations for their persistence. We further highlight current gaps in the literature and offer areas where future research can expand current knowledge.

Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Appalachian State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.