The Importance of Plasma Renin Concentrations in Intensive Care Patients with Circulatory Shock

Background: Renin is a hypoperfusion marker and a good index of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the plasma renin concentration (PRC) can represent a tissue perfusion marker for predicting mortality in patients with circulatory shock in intensive care. Methods: This prospective study included patients aged 18 years or older who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 69 patients were enrolled, of whom 37 had circulatory shock and were all diagnosed with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria, while 32 patients did not have shock. Patient groups were compared, and survival analysis was carried out. Mortality predictions of PRC, lactate and combined tests (including PRC, mottling scores, central venous saturation of oxygen, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate) were investigated with ROC analysis. Results: ICU 28-day mortality was 36.2% (n = 25) and was significantly higher in patients with circulatory shock than those without (CS:21, 56.8% vs. NS:4, 12.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). The survival was significantly higher in patients without circulatory shock than those with shock (17 vs. 16 days; p = 0.038). The increase in mottling score (HR: 1.64 [95%CI: 1.15–2.33]; p < 0.01) and PRC (HR = 1.01 [95%CI: 1.00–1.02]; p < 0.05) levels and the decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (HR = 0.98 [95%CI: 0.96–0.99]; p < 0.05) were associated with decreased survival times in the ICU patients (p < 0.001). Combined tests yielded better prediction of mortality than PRC level alone. Conclusions: PRC may reflect circulatory shock and predict survival in critically ill patients; however, larger prospective studies incorporating serial PRC measurements are needed before it can be recommended as an independent biomarker of mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093184
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Plasma Renin Concentrations in Intensive Care Patients with Circulatory Shock

S Karakurt
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The Importance of Plasma Renin Concentrations in Intensive Care Patients with Circulatory Shock

S Karakurt
article en

Abstract

Background: Renin is a hypoperfusion marker and a good index of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the plasma renin concentration (PRC) can represent a tissue perfusion marker for predicting mortality in patients with circulatory shock in intensive care. Methods: This prospective study included patients aged 18 years or older who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 69 patients were enrolled, of whom 37 had circulatory shock and were all diagnosed with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria, while 32 patients did not have shock. Patient groups were compared, and survival analysis was carried out. Mortality predictions of PRC, lactate and combined tests (including PRC, mottling scores, central venous saturation of oxygen, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate) were investigated with ROC analysis. Results: ICU 28-day mortality was 36.2% (n = 25) and was significantly higher in patients with circulatory shock than those without (CS:21, 56.8% vs. NS:4, 12.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). The survival was significantly higher in patients without circulatory shock than those with shock (17 vs. 16 days; p = 0.038). The increase in mottling score (HR: 1.64 [95%CI: 1.15–2.33]; p < 0.01) and PRC (HR = 1.01 [95%CI: 1.00–1.02]; p < 0.05) levels and the decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (HR = 0.98 [95%CI: 0.96–0.99]; p < 0.05) were associated with decreased survival times in the ICU patients (p < 0.001). Combined tests yielded better prediction of mortality than PRC level alone. Conclusions: PRC may reflect circulatory shock and predict survival in critically ill patients; however, larger prospective studies incorporating serial PRC measurements are needed before it can be recommended as an independent biomarker of mortality.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
Marmara University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.