A comparative analysis of crop water footprint, practices, and economic water productivity (EWP) in Punjab, Pakistan and Western Australia, Australia

Abstract A comprehensive analysis of crop water footprint (WFP), water use efficiency (WUE) and economic water productivity (EWP) between 2010 and 2020 in two climatically and economically diverse agricultural regions: Punjab, Pakistan and Western Australia, Australia was undertaken. Using the Water Footprint Network method and climate, soil and agricultural production data, the study quantified green, blue and grey water footprints for five staple crops in each region. Normalization by local water scarcity and irrigation share was used to compare between the two regions with different water stress levels and irrigation dependence. Results showed that the total crop water requirements in Punjab increased by 12% during the study period due to changing climatic conditions. Cotton and rice had the highest WFP and dependence on irrigation, however generated relatively low economic returns per unit of water, showcasing inefficiency in the current agricultural system. In contrast, rain-fed crops in WA showed lower absolute crop water requirements and lower increases in normalized WFP, with stable WUE and EWP with cereals, showcasing efficient water use under climate-driven limitations. Normalization highlighted the difference in water stress, identifying that Punjab’s irrigation-intensive crops put much greater stress on local water resources than WA crops. Integration of biophysical and economic indicators, when normalizing for water scarcity, provides a strong basis to assess water practice of various agricultural systems. The results indicate the necessity for location-specific approaches: increased irrigation efficiency and suitable crop selection in Punjab; and climate-resilient cropping to maximize water use productivity and economic return in WA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irrigation Science
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-026-01116-2
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of crop water footprint, practices, and economic water productivity (EWP) in Punjab, Pakistan and Western Australia, Australia

Zohreh Rajabi, Stephen Gray, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, Shakeel Hayat
Irrigation Science
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

A comparative analysis of crop water footprint, practices, and economic water productivity (EWP) in Punjab, Pakistan and Western Australia, Australia

Zohreh Rajabi, Stephen Gray, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, Shakeel Hayat
article en

Abstract

Abstract A comprehensive analysis of crop water footprint (WFP), water use efficiency (WUE) and economic water productivity (EWP) between 2010 and 2020 in two climatically and economically diverse agricultural regions: Punjab, Pakistan and Western Australia, Australia was undertaken. Using the Water Footprint Network method and climate, soil and agricultural production data, the study quantified green, blue and grey water footprints for five staple crops in each region. Normalization by local water scarcity and irrigation share was used to compare between the two regions with different water stress levels and irrigation dependence. Results showed that the total crop water requirements in Punjab increased by 12% during the study period due to changing climatic conditions. Cotton and rice had the highest WFP and dependence on irrigation, however generated relatively low economic returns per unit of water, showcasing inefficiency in the current agricultural system. In contrast, rain-fed crops in WA showed lower absolute crop water requirements and lower increases in normalized WFP, with stable WUE and EWP with cereals, showcasing efficient water use under climate-driven limitations. Normalization highlighted the difference in water stress, identifying that Punjab’s irrigation-intensive crops put much greater stress on local water resources than WA crops. Integration of biophysical and economic indicators, when normalizing for water scarcity, provides a strong basis to assess water practice of various agricultural systems. The results indicate the necessity for location-specific approaches: increased irrigation efficiency and suitable crop selection in Punjab; and climate-resilient cropping to maximize water use productivity and economic return in WA.

Irrigation ScienceVol. 44(3)
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), Charles Darwin University (AU), Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PK), Victoria University (AU)
Victoria University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.