Negotiating alternativity within boundaries: legitimacy and the dilemmas of Innovative schools in contemporary China

Introduction This paper examines how a specific type of alternative education in China—Innovative schools—negotiates its legitimacy within a particular social and political context. Methods Drawing on neo-institutional theory, we conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of the promotional materials of five Innovative schools. Findings Our analysis shows that these schools discursively negotiate their legitimacy by managing their relationships with three key audiences: mainstream education, prospective families, and state authorities. Specifically, legitimacy is constructed through calibrated differentiation: appearing superior but not deviant, inclusive in rhetoric yet selective in access, and grassroots in origin while aligned with national narratives. Discussion These findings highlight how “alternativity” is negotiated under constrained institutional and political conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1488871
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating alternativity within boundaries: legitimacy and the dilemmas of Innovative schools in contemporary China

Bram Spruyt, Wanru Xu
Frontiers in Education
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
article

Negotiating alternativity within boundaries: legitimacy and the dilemmas of Innovative schools in contemporary China

Bram Spruyt, Wanru Xu
article en

Abstract

Introduction This paper examines how a specific type of alternative education in China—Innovative schools—negotiates its legitimacy within a particular social and political context. Methods Drawing on neo-institutional theory, we conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of the promotional materials of five Innovative schools. Findings Our analysis shows that these schools discursively negotiate their legitimacy by managing their relationships with three key audiences: mainstream education, prospective families, and state authorities. Specifically, legitimacy is constructed through calibrated differentiation: appearing superior but not deviant, inclusive in rhetoric yet selective in access, and grassroots in origin while aligned with national narratives. Discussion These findings highlight how “alternativity” is negotiated under constrained institutional and political conditions.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.