From Lexicons to Large Language Models: A Holistic Evaluation of Psychometric Text Analysis in Social Science Research

Research Spotlight Abstract Extracting psychological insights from text is vital for modern analytics, yet organizations often rely on analysis tools that are either biased and simplistic or prohibitively expensive to build. Our research demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a superior alternative. They match the accuracy of specialized artificial intelligence (AI), while significantly reducing costs and technical barriers. Crucially for policy considerations, we find LLMs are statistically fairer than traditional methods. In our tests, they reduced racial and gender bias by up to 60%. Beyond assessing performance, we introduce a practical technique called “cognitive-affective prompting.” By instructing the AI to adopt specific human strengths, such as using “superior reasoning” for complex tasks or “emotional intelligence” for sentiment analysis, practitioners can boost accuracy by over 10%. To facilitate adoption, we provide a user-friendly “cookbook” to help nonexperts apply these findings immediately. For policymakers and business leaders, this research validates LLMs as a robust, consistent, and equitable standard for analyzing human behavior at scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Research
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1143
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Lexicons to Large Language Models: A Holistic Evaluation of Psychometric Text Analysis in Social Science Research

Ahmed Abbasi, Brent Kitchens, Abbie Griffith Oliver, Reza Mousavi
Information Systems Research
Mental Health via Writing
article

From Lexicons to Large Language Models: A Holistic Evaluation of Psychometric Text Analysis in Social Science Research

Ahmed Abbasi, Brent Kitchens, Abbie Griffith Oliver, Reza Mousavi
article en

Abstract

Research Spotlight Abstract Extracting psychological insights from text is vital for modern analytics, yet organizations often rely on analysis tools that are either biased and simplistic or prohibitively expensive to build. Our research demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a superior alternative. They match the accuracy of specialized artificial intelligence (AI), while significantly reducing costs and technical barriers. Crucially for policy considerations, we find LLMs are statistically fairer than traditional methods. In our tests, they reduced racial and gender bias by up to 60%. Beyond assessing performance, we introduce a practical technique called “cognitive-affective prompting.” By instructing the AI to adopt specific human strengths, such as using “superior reasoning” for complex tasks or “emotional intelligence” for sentiment analysis, practitioners can boost accuracy by over 10%. To facilitate adoption, we provide a user-friendly “cookbook” to help nonexperts apply these findings immediately. For policymakers and business leaders, this research validates LLMs as a robust, consistent, and equitable standard for analyzing human behavior at scale.

Information Systems Research
University of Notre Dame (US), University of Virginia (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.