Robust Healthcare AI Frameworks Mitigating Adversarial Attacks and Personal Data Stress Anxiety
This study presents a hybrid federated learning and explainable artificial intelligence framework, termed RobustFL, designed to mitigate adversarial attacks in medical imaging while incorporating privacy-preserving mechanisms. Focusing on chest X-ray analysis, the research systematically examined adversarial vulnerabilities and data privacy challenges in distributed healthcare systems. A simulation-based methodology was implemented using a 500-sample dataset partitioned across multiple clients in a non-independent and identically distributed setting. The framework extends federated averaging by integrating projected gradient descent-based adversarial training, differential privacy stochastic gradient descent, and SHAP-based interpretability. Experimental results demonstrate that RobustFL maintains stable performance under adversarial conditions, achieving 70% accuracy against FGSM and PGD attacks, with an adversarial success rate of approximately 30–31%. A balanced privacy budget of ε = 1.0 produced an F1-score of 0.412, indicating a trade-off between privacy and model utility. Interpretability consistency, measured via SHAP outputs, served as a proxy for trust assessment, while privacy risk indicators were used to infer potential user concern. The framework provides a practical pathway toward secure, transparent, and privacy-aware healthcare AI systems.
Authors
- Cornelia Ifeoma Ejoh
- Onyii Henry
- Damilola Abidemi Akinwunmi
- Akinde Michael Ogunmolu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4143-4517)
- Christopher Ugbong Akeke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0739-585X)
Institutions
- Howard University (US)
- University of the District of Columbia (US)
- Texas A&M University – Kingsville (US)
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science
- Published
- 2026-04-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2026/v19i4852
- Primary Topic
- Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00